Someone in this discussion has a good mindset for security.
Everyone in it has responsibilities towards protecting users from harm.
Thank you.
Jason
Jason Kinney
Ethical Technologist
Surrey, BC, Canada
jkinne...@yahoo.ca
On Wednesday, August 17, 2022, 09:22:33 a.m. PDT, Tom Beecher
wro
>
> some might conclude that "T-Mobile filters links to right-leaning news
> outlets.
>
That conclusion, based on the methodology described, would be wrong, and
that should be called out.
On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 12:09 PM Hunter Fuller wrote:
> Sure, that's why I said that in my third paragrap
Sure, that's why I said that in my third paragraph.
But once we know that they do, in fact, filter messages, we can
understand why it might *seem* like they filter based on political
content.
For example, if a left-leaning news outlet uses bit.ly URLs, and a
right-leaning one uses goo.gl URLs, and
Spam filtering is clearly not the accusation that was laid out.
On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 11:48 AM Hunter Fuller wrote:
> I wouldn't call it a serious claim. By their own admission T-Mobile
> filters messages based on content.
>
>
> https://community.t-mobile.com/accounts-services-4/can-t-send-rec
I wouldn't call it a serious claim. By their own admission T-Mobile
filters messages based on content.
https://community.t-mobile.com/accounts-services-4/can-t-send-receive-texts-that-contain-goo-gl-7776
Now, there is no indication I'm aware of, that it is political in
nature. But they do, factua
It's a pretty serious claim to say that cell providers were selectively not
delivering messages based on content.
Unless you have some more concrete evidence beyond "I sent a few texts" ,
this list is no place for such things, nor the insinuation of political
agendas.
On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 10:5
They may tell you they are not but there is no doubt in my mind they are and
if they got caught their response would be “Oopsie, my bad”.
-richey
During Covid hysteria cellular carriers were definitly scrubbing text
messages that contained things against whatever the agenda was.
There was no
and
>> if they got caught their response would be “Oopsie, my bad”.
>>
>> -richey
>>
>>
>> From: NANOG on behalf of
>> Mark Seiden
>> Date: Tuesday, August 16, 2022 at 3:48 PM
>> To: Jon Lewis
>> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
>> Subjec
opsie, my bad”.
-richey
From: NANOG on behalf of Mark
Seiden
Date: Tuesday, August 16, 2022 at 3:48 PM
To: Jon Lewis
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Google Abuse
well, that isn’t exactly true.
ALL of the fraudsters, business email compromisers, spoofing accounts are now
from gmail and a
: Jon Lewis
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Google Abuse
well, that isn’t exactly true.
ALL of the fraudsters, business email compromisers, spoofing accounts are now
from gmail and as far as i can tell,
there is no evidence that they do ANYTHING about them.i recently gave a
talk on fraudulent
, but without success, does
>> anyone happen to have a Google abuse
>> contact to indicate?
>
> There is no Google abuse. It's just traffic you don't want that they don't
> care about. Block it at your edge and move on.
>
>
On Tue, 16 Aug 2022, Cristian Cardoso wrote:
Hi
I'm receiving thousands of requests from a Google Clou VM on my network, I've
already sent reports to Abuse from GCP, but without success, does anyone happen
to have a Google abuse
contact to indicate?
There is no Google abuse.
.
-richey
From: NANOG on behalf of
Cristian Cardoso
Date: Tuesday, August 16, 2022 at 10:29 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Google Abuse
Hi
I'm receiving thousands of requests from a Google Clou VM on my network, I've
already sent reports to Abuse from GCP, but without success, does any
Hi
I'm receiving thousands of requests from a Google Clou VM on my network,
I've already sent reports to Abuse from GCP, but without success, does
anyone happen to have a Google abuse contact to indicate?
14 matches
Mail list logo
