Re: Fwd: [arin-announce] IN-ADDR.ARPA Zone Transfer Complete

2011-02-17 Thread Doug Barton
On 02/17/2011 07:11, Wolfgang Nagele wrote: Hi, Relevant to another post today, I've noticed that neither the *.ip6-servers.arpa nor the *.in-addr-servers.arpa allow axfr. Which leads to the following questions: 1. Was that a conscious decision, and if so why? Speaking for the operator of

Re: Fwd: [arin-announce] IN-ADDR.ARPA Zone Transfer Complete

2011-02-17 Thread Wolfgang Nagele
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, > Relevant to another post today, I've noticed that neither the > *.ip6-servers.arpa > nor the *.in-addr-servers.arpa allow axfr. Which leads to the following > questions: > > 1. Was that a conscious decision, and if so why? Speaking for the op

Re: Fwd: [arin-announce] IN-ADDR.ARPA Zone Transfer Complete

2011-02-16 Thread Doug Barton
John, Congratulations to you and ICANN for this significant step, at all the various layers and meanings of significant. :) Relevant to another post today, I've noticed that neither the *.ip6-servers.arpa nor the *.in-addr-servers.arpa allow axfr. Which leads to the following questions: 1.

Fwd: [arin-announce] IN-ADDR.ARPA Zone Transfer Complete

2011-02-16 Thread John Curran
Apologies for cross-posting, but I believe this relevant to the NANOG operator community. FYI, /John Begin forwarded message: From: ARIN mailto:i...@arin.net>> Date: February 16, 2011 3:53:38 PM EST To: mailto:arin-annou...@arin.net>> Subject: [arin-announce] IN-ADDR.ARPA Zone Transfer Complete