"Aaron C. de Bruyn via
NANOG"
Reply-To: "Aaron C. de Bruyn"
Date: Sunday, March 31, 2019 at 4:26 PM
To: "C. A. Fillekes"
Cc: NANOG mailing list
Subject: Re: Frontier rural FIOS & IPv6
You're not alone.
I talked with my local provider about 4 years ago
> On Mar 31, 2019, at 9:50 PM, Matt Hoppes
> wrote:
>
> The telephone example:
> What IS the benefit of DTMF other than I can dial faster? None. And I can
> use IVRs. Again - no impact to me as a telephone company.
>
OK, this is off topic to an extent, but DTMF provided the opportunity for
On 3/31/19 10:05 PM, Tom Beecher wrote:
I’m in Spectrum land, née Time Warner, née Rigas Cash Extraction
Machine... errr Adelphia. ( Buffalo / WNY )
We’ve had native v6 for quite a few years up here.
Spectrum ex. Bright House/Time Warner varies by region. NY region has
had it, apparently.
sage-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Ca By
Sent: Sunday, 31 March, 2019 18:53
To: Matt Hoppes
Cc: Aaron C. de Bruyn; NANOG mailing list
Subject: Re: Frontier rural FIOS & IPv6
On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 4:20 PM Matt Hoppes
wrote:
Going to play devils advocate.
I
I’m in Spectrum land, née Time Warner, née Rigas Cash Extraction Machine...
errr Adelphia. ( Buffalo / WNY )
We’ve had native v6 for quite a few years up here.
On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 16:55 Seth Mattinen wrote:
> On 3/31/19 13:31, David Hubbard wrote:
> > Things are no better in Spectrum land;
t; the actual payload data flows more
>>> slowly.
>>>
>>> ---
>>> The fact that there's a Highway to Hell but only a Stairway to Heaven says
>>> a lot about anticipated traffic volume.
>>>
>>>
>>>> -Original Mes
e fact that there's a Highway to Hell but only a Stairway to Heaven says a
>> lot about anticipated traffic volume.
>>
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Ca By
>>> Sent
---
The fact that there's a Highway to Hell but only a Stairway to Heaven says a
lot about anticipated traffic volume.
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Ca By
Sent: Sunday, 31 March, 2019 18:53
To: Matt Hoppes
Cc: Aaron C. de Bruyn; NANOG
icipated traffic volume.
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Ca By
>> Sent: Sunday, 31 March, 2019 18:53
>> To: Matt Hoppes
>> Cc: Aaron C. de Bruyn; NANOG mailing list
>> Subject: Re: Frontier rura
ed traffic volume.
>-Original Message-
>From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Ca By
>Sent: Sunday, 31 March, 2019 18:53
>To: Matt Hoppes
>Cc: Aaron C. de Bruyn; NANOG mailing list
>Subject: Re: Frontier rural FIOS & IPv6
>
>
>
>On S
Telcos had an advantage, they were able to put the cost of that new fancy
switch into our cost study / rate base.
So they were rewarded for spending money, and boy did they spend money.
Luke
Ns
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 31, 2019, at 7:20 PM, Mike Leber mailto:mle...@he.net>>
wrote:
You
On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 4:20 PM Matt Hoppes <
mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> wrote:
> Going to play devils advocate.
>
> If frontier has a ton of ipv4 addresses, what benefit is there to them in
> rolling out ipv6?
>
> What benefit is there to you?
>
I love xbox and xbox works better on ipv6,
You mean like pulse dialing and stepper relays vs touch tone dialing?
I'm sure there were people that felt the same about that too.
That mindset is simply you already paid for the old stuff, it's working
fine, you would rather not understand or think about the problems the
new tech solves or bene
Going to play devils advocate.
If frontier has a ton of ipv4 addresses, what benefit is there to them in
rolling out ipv6?
What benefit is there to you?
> On Mar 31, 2019, at 7:11 PM, C. A. Fillekes wrote:
>
>
> Still it's pretty darn good having real broadband on the farm. One thing at
>
Still it's pretty darn good having real broadband on the farm. One thing
at a time.
But, let's start thinking about ways to get Frontier up to speed on the
IPv6 thing.
On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 4:24 PM Aaron C. de Bruyn
wrote:
> You're not alone.
>
> I talked with my local provider about 4 year
On 3/31/19 13:31, David Hubbard wrote:
Things are no better in Spectrum land; gotta love the innovation in
monopoly markets…. I ask every year and expect it in perhaps thirty.
It depends if you're Charter or Time Warner. Charter does.
via
> NANOG"
> Reply-To: "Aaron C. de Bruyn"
> Date: Sunday, March 31, 2019 at 4:26 PM
> To: "C. A. Fillekes"
> Cc: NANOG mailing list
> Subject: Re: Frontier rural FIOS & IPv6
>
> You're not alone.
>
> I talked with my local
"C. A. Fillekes"
Cc: NANOG mailing list
Subject: Re: Frontier rural FIOS & IPv6
You're not alone.
I talked with my local provider about 4 years ago and they said "We will
probably start looking into IPv6 next year".
I talked with them last month and they said "Yeah,
You're not alone.
I talked with my local provider about 4 years ago and they said "We will
probably start looking into IPv6 next year".
I talked with them last month and they said "Yeah, everyone seems to be
offering it. I guess I'll have to start reading how to implement it".
I'm sure 2045 will
So by COB yesterday we now officially have FIOS at our farm.
Went from 3Mbps to around 30 measured average. Yay.
It's a business account, Frontier. But...still no IPv6.
The new router's capable of it. What's the hold up?
Customer service's response is "We don't offer that".
20 matches
Mail list logo
