Re: From Nov 2017...

That database could possibly be ingested and used locally. Traffic may not even be traversing to the database hosted by IBM. At least they are open about where they are getting the data that allows for blocking to certain FQDNs. On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 10:36 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote: > On 4/2/1

Re: From Nov 2017...

On 4/3/18 12:15 AM, Bill Woodcock wrote: Ok, sorry if I was being overly persnickety. My apologies. I’ve been spending too much time answering questions on “social media” and it’s making me antisocial. Commenting on social media is like having to write a dissertation perfectly with your f

Re: From Nov 2017...

On 4/3/2018 3:15 AM, Bill Woodcock wrote: >> Since when is it an offense, to merely share a publicly available URL? >> >> More to the point of Privacy, you have shared some information here >> regarding Quad9 operations that may have been beneficial to some, or many. >> It has been of benefit t

Re: From Nov 2017...

> Since when is it an offense, to merely share a publicly available URL? > > More to the point of Privacy, you have shared some information here regarding > Quad9 operations that may have been beneficial to some, or many. It has been > of benefit to me, and thanks for sharing that which what yo

Re: From Nov 2017...

On 4/3/2018 2:37 AM, Bill Woodcock wrote: > What’s your point, though? Are you talking about Quad9, or about GCA? > > If you’re talking about Quad9, you’re misleading people by implying that the > quote you pulled from the Register piece pertains to Quad9, when it does not. > > If you’re talking

Re: From Nov 2017...

> On Apr 2, 2018, at 11:28 PM, Robert Mathews (OSIA) wrote: > > On 4/3/2018 1:04 AM, Bill Woodcock wrote: >>> On Apr 2, 2018, at 7:24 PM, Robert Mathews (OSIA) >>> wrote: *Group Co-founded by City of London >>> Police promises 'no snooping on your requests’* >> Note that this is _extremely_ mi

Re: From Nov 2017...

On 4/3/2018 1:04 AM, Bill Woodcock wrote: >> On Apr 2, 2018, at 7:24 PM, Robert Mathews (OSIA) >> wrote: *Group Co-founded by City of London >> Police promises 'no snooping on your requests’* > Note that this is _extremely_ misleading, since the group being > referred to here is _not_ Quad9, but

Re: From Nov 2017...

> On Apr 2, 2018, at 7:24 PM, Robert Mathews (OSIA) wrote: > *Group Co-founded by City of London Police promises 'no snooping on your > requests’* Note that this is _extremely_ misleading, since the group being referred to here is _not_ Quad9, but instead GCA, one of the many donors that are

Re: From Nov 2017...

On 4/2/18 7:43 PM, J Crowe wrote: That database could possibly be ingested and used locally. Traffic may not even be traversing to the database hosted by IBM. At least they are open about where they are getting the data that allows for blocking to certain FQDNs. Even if it does traverse som

Re: From Nov 2017...

On 4/2/18 7:24 PM, Robert Mathews (OSIA) wrote: To be clear. *DNS resolver 9.9.9.9 will check requests against IBM threat database* To be clear on what? That an IBM database is queried, just like it says on their website? That doesn't mean they are recording who is making what requests.

From Nov 2017...

To be clear. *DNS resolver 9.9.9.9 will check requests against IBM threat database* *Group Co-founded by City of London Police promises 'no snooping on your requests'* By Richard Chirgwin 20 Nov 2017 at 06:58 The Register (UK)