Hi Adam,
Le 31/05/2019 à 13:48, adamv0...@netconsultings.com a écrit :
There's got to be vendors out there having an optical chasses with a
combination of OTN and ethernet cards for the revenue side of the chasses
-look at transmode/Infinera maybe?
For now the only vendor which seems to fit th
> From: NANOG On Behalf Of Brandon Martin
> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2019 9:16 PM
>
> I see what you're getting at. It sounds like you want to light up a 100Gb
> wave, put some committed "dedicated wavelength" services on it, then take
> whatever's left and hand it off on 100GbE for best-effort/g
Hi Radu,
There might be some misunderstanding here. I don't care about what's
sold or done *today*, I'm thinking ahead of what newer hardware and
software will allow us to build in the (near) future.
That's probably something most of us lack : freedom to look ahead,
rather than being swamped
On Thu, May 30, 2019, at 09:41, Jérôme Nicolle wrote:
> Yup. Should it hard-drop ? Buffer ? Both are unthinkable in OTN terms
> (is that a cultural thing ?). It's what packet networks are made for.
> And that's why an alien device, with support for Ethernet, OTN and
> programmable pipelines, cou
On 05/30/2019 03:40, Jérôme Nicolle wrote:
What I have in mind is actually to combine line-rate ODUs with a static
mapping and pipe the uncommitted capacity to a packet-switch.
Statically commited services will be muxponded in fastpath, hence no
jitter and less latency, while the fractionnal p
Brandon,
Le 30/05/2019 à 03:46, Brandon Martin a écrit :
The only way I know to do this is to packet switch, as either Ethernet
or GFP-F OTN traffic, the subscriber data onto a FlexODU at the desired
subscriber rate within the OTU4. Other traffic could then be placed
within the same OTU4 usin
On 5/29/19 3:53 PM, Mitcheltree, Harold B wrote:
https://www.ekinops.com/products/flexrate-modules/aggregation-and-encryption-modules/pm-100g-agg
I'm not sure I see how this particular product resolves the concern I
expressed.
Yes, it will aggregate native subrate services at 10Gbps or 40Gbp
ubject: Re: Flexible OTN / fractional 100GbE
On 5/28/19 11:12 AM, Jérôme Nicolle wrote:
> OTN is important for this project because we'd need many of its features
> in terms of FEC, monitoring and low jitter.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't "fractional" Ether
On 5/28/19 11:12 AM, Jérôme Nicolle wrote:
OTN is important for this project because we'd need many of its features
in terms of FEC, monitoring and low jitter.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't "fractional" Ethernet services
require packet switching with corresponding jitter anyway? It wo
Tom,
Le 29/05/2019 à 16:20, Tom Hill a écrit :
> Very clear. If you do find this veritable moon-on-a-stick device,
> please do let me know.
I will. But I don't think it's for the lack of devices : every OCP
switch based on Broadcom's StrataDNX ASICs seems technicaly capable of
handling OTN, they
On 29/05/2019 15:09, Jérôme Nicolle wrote:
> I don't find what I need there. I just want to plug an OTU4 uplink in a
> standard QSFP28 port, no fancy photonics are required, and benefit from
> inband monitoring and management, FEC and trafic isolation.
>
> It would idealy be represented in ONL or
Hi Tom,
Le 29/05/2019 à 15:18, Tom Hill a écrit :
> A big part of my usecase was reselling the spare capacity, so I really
> didn't want anything learning MACs at either end. :)
Also tried with packetlight, but they offer no support for ODUFlex and
didn't implement latency/jitter monitoring. Also
On 28/05/2019 11:41, Jérôme Nicolle wrote:
> I'm looking for a muxponder that would take OTU4s on the network side
> and provide 10/40/100GbE on the client side, with some kind of
> oversubscription, as to provide a "fractional 100GbE" e.g. starting with
> 30-60Gbps commit that could be upgraded to
Hello Jason,
Thanks for your answer.
Le 28/05/2019 à 13:02, Jason Lixfeld a écrit :
> IP Infusion’s OcNOS is geared towards OCP gear, and while it’s not
> exactly what you’re looking for,
I didn't see any mention of OTN in their software's specs.
OTN is important for this project because we'd
> On May 28, 2019, at 6:41 AM, Jérôme Nicolle wrote:
>
> Hi NaNOG !
>
> I'm looking for a muxponder that would take OTU4s on the network side
> and provide 10/40/100GbE on the client side, with some kind of
> oversubscription, as to provide a "fractional 100GbE" e.g. starting with
> 30-60Gbps
Hi NaNOG !
I'm looking for a muxponder that would take OTU4s on the network side
and provide 10/40/100GbE on the client side, with some kind of
oversubscription, as to provide a "fractional 100GbE" e.g. starting with
30-60Gbps commit that could be upgraded to 100GbE when network capacity
is availa
16 matches
Mail list logo
