Honestly good call and we’re looking at raising funds to do exactly that -
however some of these buildings have values near a billion dollars each and
there is more money in commercial real estate than telecom.
In my experience these things tend to crop-up with ownership of the building
being a
On 9/22/21 6:12 PM, Lady Benjamin Cannon of Glencoe, ASCE wrote:
If someone were to make us remove a redundant DWDM node, we’d charge them list
price to ever consider putting it back*, plus a deposit, plus our costs for the
removal in the first place. Bad move. Enjoy the $8million, it could c
If someone were to make us remove a redundant DWDM node, we’d charge them list
price to ever consider putting it back*, plus a deposit, plus our costs for the
removal in the first place. Bad move. Enjoy the $8million, it could cost more
than that to undo this mistake.
*you’d actually never ev
Yes that’s correct, however the definition of “reasonable” appears to have been
decided to be “what they charge the other carriers, if anything”
Ms. Lady Benjamin PD Cannon of Glencoe, ASCE
6x7 Networks & 6x7 Telecom, LLC
CEO
l...@6by7.net
"The only fully end-to-end encrypted global telecommuni
On 23/9/21 3:01 am, Grant Taylor via NANOG wrote:
> On 9/22/21 10:45 AM, Lady Benjamin Cannon of Glencoe, ASCE wrote:
>> Half-penny pinching “mah powah” landlords are especially annoying in a
>> cosmic sense
>
> I know someone who had a bit of a different experience.
>
> Someone, purportedly t
Those, as well as cable and label tags with the NOC nunber, are worth their
weight in gold to be honest.
Almost any telco should give you a Right of Entry agreement that codified
things like insurance, etc. It’s “our gear” so of course we are responsible
for it, but you should codify it in an
On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 14:47:32 -0500
wrote:
> Whatever it is, the owner comes running when the local maintenance
> apprentice unplugs it…. He tells me they show up within 30-45 minutes.
We've attempted to address this problem by having plastic tags
on the power cords that basically say "do
Appreciate everyone’s comments here. Lots of good responses. I think the client
isn’t really looking to squeeze the equipment owner here, more so just looking
for a formal agreement that codifies responsibility, insurance, points of
contact for notifications, etc… (the leaking battery example is
Forgive the top post...
This issue /can/ be complicated, but I have some direct
experience with a lot of variations on this.
It sounds like this particular situation might involve
equipment that is part of a Metro ring. This is pretty nice because it
might mean there is redundanc
Everything is negotiable. The building owner/representative can negotiate
with the telco any terms they wish.
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 9:30 AM wrote:
> A few of the buildings that my firm represents have the local telco’s
> fiber distribution and/or repeater equipment located on the premises. M
If they're regularly sending people out to maintain the gear, and saying
it's part of a "ring" that means it's probably part of their
infrastructure and not just a local customer edge device for the building.
If you opt to bill them and they decide to pull out, they're still "on-net"
meaning at any
lling to provide a little power to be able to say
"apartments in my building all have fiber Internet". And potentially charge a
little more in the rent.
Shawn
-Original Message-
From: "Grant Taylor via NANOG"
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 1:01pm
To: nanog@n
On 9/22/21 10:45 AM, Lady Benjamin Cannon of Glencoe, ASCE wrote:
Half-penny pinching “mah powah” landlords are especially annoying in a
cosmic sense
I know someone who had a bit of a different experience.
Someone, purportedly the telco but I'm not sure who, had telco equipment
in a building
The building owner has no obligation to the provider. If it provides no
value, call them and tell them to remove the equipment if you don't want
it in your building.
Aaron
On 9/22/2021 11:23 AM, jra...@gmail.com wrote:
A few of the buildings that my firm represents have the local telco’s
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 9:29 AM wrote:
> A few of the buildings that my firm represents have the local telco’s fiber
> distribution and/or repeater equipment located on the premises. My
> understanding is that when one of these links go down, (we’ve occasionally
> had to interrupt circuit power
It gives them the right to enter the building, but the building can charge “a
reasonable fee” for things like power/space/cooling.
Shane Ronan
> On Sep 22, 2021, at 12:45 PM, Lady Benjamin Cannon of Glencoe, ASCE
> wrote:
>
> Fiber in a building adds 8% to the value of that building. Half-p
Fiber in a building adds 8% to the value of that building. Half-penny pinching
“mah powah” landlords are especially annoying in a cosmic sense - and just make
me want to replace them.
The telecommunications act of 1934 permits telcos to enter a building with
their equipment.
I’d upgrade the
A few of the buildings that my firm represents have the local telco's fiber
distribution and/or repeater equipment located on the premises. My
understanding is that when one of these links go down, (we've occasionally
had to interrupt circuit power to do maintenance in a building for one
reason or
18 matches
Mail list logo
