http://route-aggregation.net/
>
>
> > When will router vendors learn to do even simple aggregation before
> loading
> > routes into FIB? It appears that most hardware will have plenty of FIB
> > space if this was done. Also that aggregated routes are increasing at a
> > slower pace.
>
> Howdy,
>
> You can get a good reduction w
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 7:28 AM, Baldur Norddahl
wrote:
> When will router vendors learn to do even simple aggregation before loading
> routes into FIB? It appears that most hardware will have plenty of FIB
> space if this was done. Also that aggregated routes are increasing at a
> slower pace.
H
When de aggregation hit IPv6, with lot of /48
> On 25 июля 2015 г., at 14:28, Baldur Norddahl
> wrote:
>
>> On 22 July 2015 at 06:51, William Herrin wrote:
>>
>> The IPv4 BGP table has been growing by 10% to 15% per year since CIDR.
>> It appears to be a compounding curve, not linear.
>>
>>
On 22 July 2015 at 06:51, William Herrin wrote:
> The IPv4 BGP table has been growing by 10% to 15% per year since CIDR.
> It appears to be a compounding curve, not linear.
>
> IPv4 exhaustion is a new factor which may or may not impact the next
> 24 months' projection. There are arguments favori
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Graham Johnston
wrote:
> Does anybody have a working projection, or crystal ball, that can provide a
> recommendation on FIB size requirements for the next 24 months? Are we
> expecting the IPv4 table to continue to grow at somewhere around 50k routes a
> year?
Does anybody have a working projection, or crystal ball, that can provide a
recommendation on FIB size requirements for the next 24 months? Are we
expecting the IPv4 table to continue to grow at somewhere around 50k routes a
year? I came up with this from eyeballing the graph at
http://www.cid
7 matches
Mail list logo
