Re: External sanity checks

2011-02-05 Thread Zaid Ali
On Feb 4, 2011, at 1:36 PM, Franck Martin wrote: > > - Original Message - >> From: "Paul Graydon" >> To: nanog@nanog.org >> Sent: Friday, 4 February, 2011 8:39:09 AM >> Subject: Re: External sanity checks >> On 02/03/2011 08:04 AM, Philip L

Re: External sanity checks

2011-02-05 Thread Ghislain
Le 05/02/2011 08:59, Siggi Bjarnason a écrit : > I've been using Site24x7 for some time now and am very pleased with them, > plus their pricing is very reasonable. i am very pleased by serverguard24.com services. -- Cordialement, Ghislain smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signatur

Re: External sanity checks

2011-02-05 Thread Siggi Bjarnason
I've been using Site24x7 for some time now and am very pleased with them, plus their pricing is very reasonable. Siggi Bjarnason si...@bjarnason.us "In free countries, every man is entitled to express his opinions and every other man is entitled not to listen." - G. Norman Collie On Thu, Feb 3

RE: External sanity checks

2011-02-04 Thread Justin Horstman
> -Original Message- > From: R A Lichtensteiger [mailto:rali+na...@tifosi.com] > Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 9:50 AM > To: Justin Horstman > Cc: nanog > Subject: Re: External sanity checks > > Justin Horstman wrote: > > <> +1 vote for Gomez,

Re: External sanity checks

2011-02-04 Thread R A Lichtensteiger
Justin Horstman wrote: <> +1 vote for Gomez, they are the most advanced and most capable in <> this space. They are also not very cheap... And Gomez' service contracts include automatic rollover. -1 on Gomez R -- R A Lichtensteiger r...@tifosi.com "Dual [IS-IS] is intended to be more o

Re: External sanity checks

2011-02-03 Thread Christopher Morrow
.. >>> >>> >>> ~J >>> >>>> -Original Message- >>>> From: Greg Dendy [mailto:gde...@equinix.com] >>>> Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 10:35 AM >>>> To: Brandon Galbraith >>>> Cc: nanog >>>>

Re: External sanity checks

2011-02-03 Thread nevin
~J >> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Greg Dendy [mailto:gde...@equinix.com] >>> Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 10:35 AM >>> To: Brandon Galbraith >>> Cc: nanog >>> Subject: Re: External sanity checks >>> >>> Gome

Re: External sanity checks

2011-02-03 Thread Franck Martin
- Original Message - > From: "Paul Graydon" > To: nanog@nanog.org > Sent: Friday, 4 February, 2011 8:39:09 AM > Subject: Re: External sanity checks > On 02/03/2011 08:04 AM, Philip Lavine wrote: > > To all, > > > > Does any one know a Ven

Re: External sanity checks

2011-02-03 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 7:55 AM, Justin Horstman wrote: > +1 vote for Gomez, they are the most advanced and most capable in this space. > They are also not very cheap... Depends on whether you're monitoring SLA or performance from remote locations. There's also webmetrics (acquired by neustar so

Re: External sanity checks

2011-02-03 Thread Jeffrey Lyon
t; Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 10:35 AM >> To: Brandon Galbraith >> Cc: nanog >> Subject: Re: External sanity checks >> >> Gomez isn't too bad either for the http side. >> >> http://www.gomez.com/ >> >> >> Greg >> >> On

RE: External sanity checks

2011-02-03 Thread Justin Horstman
ject: Re: External sanity checks > > Gomez isn't too bad either for the http side. > > http://www.gomez.com/ > > > Greg > > On Feb 3, 2011, at 10:29 AM, "Brandon Galbraith" > wrote: > > > Pingdom will do most of what you're look

Re: External sanity checks

2011-02-03 Thread Paul Graydon
On 02/03/2011 08:04 AM, Philip Lavine wrote: To all, Does any one know a Vendor (NOT Keynote) that can do sanity checks against your web/smtp/ftp farms with pings, traceroutes, latency checks as well as application checks (GET, POST, ESMTP, etc) Thank you, Philip Slight hijack, I'm interest

Re: External sanity checks

2011-02-03 Thread Greg Dendy
Gomez isn't too bad either for the http side. http://www.gomez.com/ Greg On Feb 3, 2011, at 10:29 AM, "Brandon Galbraith" wrote: > Pingdom will do most of what you're looking for (www.pingdom.com). We're > quite fond of them after a bad Keynote experience. > > -brandon > > On Thu, Feb 3,

Re: External sanity checks

2011-02-03 Thread Randy McAnally
On Thu, 3 Feb 2011 10:04:10 -0800 (PST), Philip Lavine wrote > To all, > > Does any one know a Vendor (NOT Keynote) that can do sanity checks > against your web/smtp/ftp farms with pings, traceroutes, latency > checks as well as application checks (GET, POST, ESMTP, etc) I've had good results

Re: External sanity checks

2011-02-03 Thread Jason J. W. Williams
We've been pretty happy with Pingdom. They do latency with all the healthchecks...give pretty nice history graphs of latency and uptime. They'll do automatic traceroutes when a check hard fails (I.e. 3 fails from 3 different geographic locations). -J Jason J. W. Williams, COO/CTO DigiTar

Re: External sanity checks

2011-02-03 Thread Brandon Galbraith
Pingdom will do most of what you're looking for (www.pingdom.com). We're quite fond of them after a bad Keynote experience. -brandon On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 12:04 PM, Philip Lavine wrote: > To all, > > Does any one know a Vendor (NOT Keynote) that can do sanity checks against > your web/smtp/ftp

External sanity checks

2011-02-03 Thread Philip Lavine
To all, Does any one know a Vendor (NOT Keynote) that can do sanity checks against your web/smtp/ftp farms with pings, traceroutes, latency checks as well as application checks (GET, POST, ESMTP, etc) Thank you, Philip