On Tuesday, 15 January, 2019 12:10, James Downs wrote:
>On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 06:46:07PM +0100, Tei wrote:
>> Is very hard to replace a open protocol, wrapping may work if the
>> protocol is mostly abandoned (IRC) but thats not the case for
>> email.
> IRC is far from abandonded. There are
On 01/15/2019 10:46 AM, Tei wrote:
I think the newsgroups died because was expensive for ISPs and filled
with nasty stuff (warez and porn).
I believe newsgroups are still very much so alive and quite active. I
see 15k ~ 20k messages / 50 ~ 75 MB of /text/ newsgroups daily on my
server. My ~
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 06:46:07PM +0100, Tei wrote:
> Is very hard to replace a open protocol, wrapping may work if the
> protocol is mostly abandoned (IRC) but thats not the case for email.
IRC is far from abandonded. There are lots of very active networks,
2 of which I use continously.
But,
On Tue, 15 Jan 2019 at 09:21, Bjørn Mork wrote:
..
> open protocols, just shut off SMTP completely. They'll
> probably "invent" something much better as an excuse... And the masses
> will love them for that, because it finally removed the spam "problem".
>
> And everyone has a gmail account anyway
On 1/15/19 12:19 AM, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> And everyone has a gmail account anyway, so why bother with outside
> email?
Two words: "search warrants." I'm a US citizen, and I do NOT like the
idea of power-hungry people being able to paw through my mail. Having
my own mail server, residing in my ho
Miles Fidelman writes:
> Ever since the net went commercial, we've been seeing more and more
> walled gardens - driven by folks with an economic advantage to
> segmenting & capturing audiences. Whenever someone talks about how
> great some new technology is, I'm always reminded to "follow the
>
On 1/14/19 1:49 PM, John R. Levine wrote:
And you won't really have a choice because unless you're willing to go
full Ted Kaczynski one in a hundred of those emails will be very, very
important to you ...
Yeah. E-mail remains the only scheme where the two parties don't have
to be introduced
And you won't really have a choice because unless you're willing to go
full Ted Kaczynski one in a hundred of those emails will be very, very
important to you ...
Yeah. E-mail remains the only scheme where the two parties
don't have to be introduced first, don't have to be online at the same
In article <871s5gpz1w@miraculix.mork.no> you write:
>Yes. What is all the fuzz about? Email will be as dead as USENET in a
>couple of years anyway.
Funny, people have been saying that pretty much every year since the
1990s.
What's different this time?
Yes. What is all the fuzz about? Email will be as dead as USENET in a
couple of years anyway.
Welcome to the age of "feeds". You may cry now.
Bjørn
What Jason said in red.
On 1/12/19 6:07 PM, Jason Hellenthal via NANOG wrote:
> Honestly, you feel very highly of your work in which any of us do in
> this field but John has a very good point and constructive criticism
> shroud not be the down fall of anyone. Read it 100 times without
> taking an
11 matches
Mail list logo
