Re: EIGRP support !Cisco

2014-04-18 Thread Laurent Vanbever
Hi folks, A bunch of collaborators and I worked on the problem of IGP migration/reconfiguration before. Basically, we augmented Vijay’s methodology to guarantee its correctness. Indeed, when you start flipping Administrative Distance (AD) between IGP1 and IGP2, bad stuff (i.e., forwarding loops

Re: EIGRP support !Cisco

2014-01-24 Thread Jimmy Hess
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote: > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote: > > On 08/01/2014 18:14, Christopher Morrow wrote: > >> question... there's people that have done this before even :) > > https://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog29/presentations/gill.

Re: EIGRP support !Cisco

2014-01-10 Thread Christopher Morrow
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote: > On 08/01/2014 18:14, Christopher Morrow wrote: >> you could employ one of the several methods to migrate from 'less >> desirable igp' to 'more desirable igp' on all of the things in >> question... there's people that have done this before ev

Re: EIGRP support !Cisco

2014-01-10 Thread Nick Hilliard
On 08/01/2014 18:14, Christopher Morrow wrote: > you could employ one of the several methods to migrate from 'less > desirable igp' to 'more desirable igp' on all of the things in > question... there's people that have done this before even :) https://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog29/presentations/g

Re: EIGRP support !Cisco

2014-01-08 Thread Ray Soucy
Use a standard protocol and redistribute between the two. OSPF is likely the easiest way to go for this. I like EIGRP, but I don't think I like it enough to try a non-Cisco implementation of it. At least with OSPF you know that most of the bugs have been worked out (hopefully). On Wed, Jan 8, 2

Re: EIGRP support !Cisco

2014-01-08 Thread joel jaeggli
On 1/8/14, 10:02 AM, Dobbins, Roland wrote: > > On Jan 9, 2014, at 12:52 AM, Nick Olsen wrote: > >> But this is needed to integrate into an existing network. > > Route redistribution? I've done mixed eigrp ospf environments in places where I wasn't responsible for legacy decisions... it worke

Re: EIGRP support !Cisco

2014-01-08 Thread Christopher Morrow
; on all of the things in question... there's people that have done this before even :) > Thanks! > > Nick Olsen > Network Operations > (855) FLSPEED x106 > > > From: "Nick Hilliard" > Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 201

Re: EIGRP support !Cisco

2014-01-08 Thread Nick Olsen
lhsi.com, nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: EIGRP support !Cisco On 08/01/2014 17:52, Nick Olsen wrote: > Completely agree. But this is needed to integrate into an existing network. > OSPF would've been my first choice. you'll need to pay cisco tax then. Cisco opened up most of eigrp to t

Re: EIGRP support !Cisco

2014-01-08 Thread Nick Hilliard
On 08/01/2014 17:52, Nick Olsen wrote: > Completely agree. But this is needed to integrate into an existing network. > OSPF would've been my first choice. you'll need to pay cisco tax then. Cisco opened up most of eigrp to the ietf as an informational rfc, but didn't release anything related to e

Re: EIGRP support !Cisco

2014-01-08 Thread Dobbins, Roland
On Jan 9, 2014, at 12:52 AM, Nick Olsen wrote: > But this is needed to integrate into an existing network. Route redistribution? >cringe< or eBGP? --- Roland Dobbins // Luck is the

Re: EIGRP support !Cisco

2014-01-08 Thread Dobbins, Roland
On Jan 9, 2014, at 12:50 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote: > IGP migration is quite do-able, even for large networks, and all cisco +1 --- Roland Dobbins // Luck is the residue of opportunity

Re: EIGRP support !Cisco

2014-01-08 Thread Nick Olsen
n...@flhsi.com, nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: EIGRP support !Cisco On 08/01/2014 17:30, Nick Olsen wrote: > Looking for EIGRP support in a platform other than Cisco. Since it was > opened up last year. We have a situation where we need to integrate into a > network running EIGRP and would l

Re: EIGRP support !Cisco

2014-01-08 Thread Nick Hilliard
On 08/01/2014 17:30, Nick Olsen wrote: > Looking for EIGRP support in a platform other than Cisco. Since it was > opened up last year. We have a situation where we need to integrate into a > network running EIGRP and would like to avoid cisco if at all possible. Why not use isis or ospf? Both a

Re: EIGRP support !Cisco

2014-01-08 Thread Dobbins, Roland
On Jan 9, 2014, at 12:30 AM, Nick Olsen wrote: > Any thoughts? --- Roland Dobbins // Luck is the residue of opportunity and design.

EIGRP support !Cisco

2014-01-08 Thread Nick Olsen
Looking for EIGRP support in a platform other than Cisco. Since it was opened up last year. We have a situation where we need to integrate into a network running EIGRP and would like to avoid cisco if at all possible. Any thoughts? Nick Olsen Network Operations (855) FLSPEED x106