Long time I had the same opinion, however, if someone operates a network
with multiple upstream providers the operator should be able to afford a
proper out of band console access which solves this issue completely.
I would only accept a default route on Uplinks where I am only receiving
a par
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Berry Mobley wrote:
> I'm wondering how many of you who are multihomed
> also add default routes pointing to your providers
> from whom you are receiving full feeds.
>
> If so, why? If not, why not?
Back when I worked for the DNC we ran into a problem with the TCA
them and full
>>> routing tables.
>>>>
>>>> I have seen cases where if there is no default route, the traffic didn't
>>> know where to go, even with full routes from all my providers.
>>>>
>>>> -Mike
>>>>
>
nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Default routes on BGP routers with full feeds
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Nov 5, 2014, at 7:49 AM, Andreas Larsen wrote:
There is one setup where you would need default route from your provider.
If you have no IBGP between two sites and your pr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Nov 5, 2014, at 7:49 AM, Andreas Larsen wrote:
There is one setup where you would need default route from your provider.
If you have no IBGP between two sites and your prefix is a large /16 on side
and maybe a /18 from that /16 on another site.
-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Berry Mobley
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2014 12:47 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Default routes on BGP routers with full feeds
I'm wondering how many of you who are multihomed also add default
routes pointing to your providers from whom
On Tuesday, November 04, 2014 07:47:21 PM Berry Mobley
wrote:
> I'm wondering how many of you who are multihomed also add
> default routes pointing to your providers from whom you
> are receiving full feeds.
>
> If so, why? If not, why not?
We filter out default routes from our upstreams, but m
.org] On Behalf Of Berry Mobley
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2014 12:47 PM
> > To: nanog@nanog.org
> > Subject: Default routes on BGP routers with full feeds
> >
> > I'm wondering how many of you who are multihomed also add default
> > routes pointing to your providers from whom you are receiving full feeds.
> >
> > If so, why? If not, why not?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Berry
>
>
t; Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2014 12:47 PM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Default routes on BGP routers with full feeds
>
> I'm wondering how many of you who are multihomed also add default
> routes pointing to your providers from whom you are receiving full feeds.
>
> If so, why? If not, why not?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Berry
Usually, when this is done, it is an adjunct to providing connectivity fast
while the table is loading on a connection reset.
Owen
> On Nov 4, 2014, at 9:47 AM, Berry Mobley wrote:
>
> I'm wondering how many of you who are multihomed also add default routes
> pointing to your providers from w
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Berry Mobley wrote:
> I'm wondering how many of you who are
> multihomed also add default routes pointing
> to your providers from whom you are receiving full feeds.
Back when I was in the ISP world I installed a default route pointing to a
data capture machine. T
> On Nov 4, 2014, at 1:25 PM, Mike Walter wrote:
>
> I have 5 providers and we get the default from all of them and full routing
> tables.
>
> I have seen cases where if there is no default route, the traffic didn't know
> where to go, even with full routes from all my providers.
We put so
e BGP session helps ensure that I
don't route traffic into a MPLS VPN that is not ours.
Steven Naslund
Chicago IL
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Berry Mobley
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2014 11:47 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Default rou
-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Berry Mobley
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2014 12:47 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Default routes on BGP routers with full feeds
I'm wondering how many of you who are multihomed also add default
routes pointing to your providers from whom you are receiving full fee
I often opt to leave one or more default routes configured with low
priority (lower than BGP). The thinking is that if there is a fault with
BGP, the router will still operate and the fault can be corrected
remotely (in-band). The downside is that I might pass traffic for
non-existing destinati
I'm wondering how many of you who are multihomed also add default
routes pointing to your providers from whom you are receiving full feeds.
If so, why? If not, why not?
Thanks,
Berry
I'm wondering how many of you who are multihomed also add default
routes pointing to your providers from whom you are receiving full feeds.
If so, why? If not, why not?
Thanks,
Berry
17 matches
Mail list logo
