Yes, of course Windstream supports RTBH, we have a standard community and have
had for years, depending on which legacy AS you connect with us the tag you
would have been given might be different. Our current AS7029 standard for RTBH
is to tag your route(s) with 4506 and we will black hole the t
On 1 February 2016 at 08:17, joel jaeggli wrote:
Hey,
> source based RTBH requires urpf, which while generally available may
> have practical limitations on implementation.
I'd say uRPF/loose is one way to do it on some platforms. In JunOS for
longest time it was not possible, and in default co
On 1/30/16 2:29 PM, Matthew D. Hardeman wrote:
> You offer this service to your customers, don’t you? ;-)
source based RTBH requires urpf, which while generally available may
have practical limitations on implementation.
> Seriously, it’s a good question. Most IP transit providers offering BGP
On 1/30/2016 2:33 PM, Job Snijders wrote:
vote with your wallet?
If this doesn't change, then that's the plan at the conclusion of the
contract.
On 1/30/2016 4:29 PM, Matthew D. Hardeman wrote:
Seriously, it’s a good question. Most IP transit providers offering BGP
services do offer RTB
You offer this service to your customers, don’t you? ;-)
Seriously, it’s a good question. Most IP transit providers offering BGP
services do offer RTBH.
> On Jan 29, 2016, at 10:51 PM, George Skorup wrote:
>
> Why doesn't Windstream have RTBH for their BGP customers? It cannot be
> impossi
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 10:51:05PM -0600, George Skorup wrote:
> Why doesn't Windstream have RTBH for their BGP customers? It cannot be
> impossible to implement.
vote with your wallet?
Why doesn't Windstream have RTBH for their BGP customers? It cannot be
impossible to implement.
7 matches
Mail list logo
