-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi, NANOGers.
> We're a bit past our change window, and my apologies for that. We're
> almost at the finish line, however, so I'll beg your indulgences while
> we wind it up.
We've completed the change and all looks migrated and happy. The change
w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi again, NANOGers.
> My apologies! We had a configuration "oops" during a migration to a new
> back-end infrastructure. We're working through that now, and I believe
> we have it sorted. I'll send out a more gory detailed update in a bit.
We're m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi, NANOGers.
> Did anyone else notice that the path changed from 65332 to 65332 65331
> earlier today?
My apologies! We had a configuration "oops" during a migration to a new
back-end infrastructure. We're working through that now, and I believe
w
Did anyone else notice that the path changed from 65332 to 65332 65331
earlier today?
We certainly did when we starting advertising all the bogons to our ISP
peers. Probably should have had an inbound AS path filter on that cymru
peering...
On 16/09/2013 18:01, Ben Bartsch wrote:
> We certainly did when we starting advertising all the bogons to our ISP
> peers. Probably should have had an inbound AS path filter on that cymru
> peering...
better still, tag them all with a BGP community to make a note that they
are bogons from Cymru (
5 matches
Mail list logo