Covering prefix blackholing traffic to one of its covered prefixes....

2017-04-24 Thread Steven Wallace
We have dual-homed sites that only accept routes from their peers, and default to their transit provider. A site may receive a covering prefix from a peer, but since they are not accepting the full table from their transit provider they don’t see the covered (i.e., more specific). In some cases

Re: Covering prefix blackholing traffic to one of its covered prefixes....

2017-04-24 Thread Joel Jaeggli
Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 23, 2017, at 08:59, Steven Wallace wrote: > > We have dual-homed sites that only accept routes from their peers, and > default to their transit provider. A site may receive a covering prefix from > a peer, but since they are not accepting the full table from thei

Re: Covering prefix blackholing traffic to one of its covered prefixes....

2017-04-24 Thread Niels Bakker
* s...@iu.edu (Steven Wallace) [Mon 24 Apr 2017, 16:51 CEST]: We have dual-homed sites that only accept routes from their peers, and default to their transit provider. A site may receive a covering prefix from a peer, but since they are not accepting the full table from their transit provider t

Covering prefix blackholing traffic to one of its covered prefixes....

2017-04-24 Thread Steven Wallace
We have dual-homed sites that only accept routes from their peers, and default to their transit provider. A site may receive a covering prefix from a peer, but since they are not accepting the full table from their transit provider they don’t see the covered (i.e., more specific). In some cases