IMPORTANT - Comcast IPv6 Trials

2010-05-09 Thread John Jason Brzozowski
Folks, Wanted to send a short note out about some email that you have seen recently regarding Comcast's IPv6 trials. When you visit http://trial.comcast.net please be sure that you visit the following link "Completed Introduction Survey?" at the bottom right hand side of the IPv6 trial page. Thi

Comcast IPv6 trials

2010-04-19 Thread Brian Keefer
Check your inboxes :) -- bk

Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials Update

2010-03-01 Thread Tony Varriale
- Original Message - From: "Curtis Maurand" To: Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 8:21 AM Subject: Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials Update Can anyone recommend a decent book on IPV6? Most of what I find on the net don't explain things very well. thanks, Curtis Deploying I

RE: Comcast IPv6 Trials Update

2010-03-01 Thread Martin, Paul
Subject: Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials Update Did you check out IPv6 Essentials, 2nd edition by Siliva Hagen? John 609-377-6594 - Original Message - From: Brad Fleming To: Curtis Maurand Cc: nanog@nanog.org Sent: Mon Mar 01 09:27:48 2010 Subject: Re: Comcast IP

Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials Update

2010-03-01 Thread Brzozowski, John
Did you check out IPv6 Essentials, 2nd edition by Siliva Hagen? John 609-377-6594 - Original Message - From: Brad Fleming To: Curtis Maurand Cc: nanog@nanog.org Sent: Mon Mar 01 09:27:48 2010 Subject: Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials Update I found "Migr

Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials Update

2010-03-01 Thread Brad Fleming
I found "Migrating to IPv6: A practical guide to implementing IPv6 in mobile and fixed networks" by Marc Blanchet very well written and "worth the price of admission". ISBN: 978-0471-49892-6 -- Brad Fleming On Mar 1, 2010, at 8:21 AM, Curtis Maurand wrote: Can anyone recommend a decent bo

Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials Update

2010-03-01 Thread Curtis Maurand
Can anyone recommend a decent book on IPV6? Most of what I find on the net don't explain things very well. thanks, Curtis On 2/28/2010 2:08 PM, John Jason Brzozowski wrote: Mike, Are you looking for something specific on www.comcast6.net? We will likely be making some content updates in t

Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials Update

2010-02-28 Thread John Jason Brzozowski
Mike, Are you looking for something specific on www.comcast6.net? We will likely be making some content updates in the not too distant future and over time as the trials progress and evolve. If there is something specific you would like to see send me your suggestions. Thanks, John On 2/26/1

RE: Comcast IPv6 Trials Update

2010-02-26 Thread Brandon Kim
Wow that's great, hopefully Cablevision will do the same with their optimum online!!! > From: mich...@thegrebs.com > Subject: Fwd: Comcast IPv6 Trials Update > Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:15:45 -0500 > To: nanog@nanog.org > > Received this message today. They haven

Fwd: Comcast IPv6 Trials Update

2010-02-26 Thread Michael Greb
Received this message today. They haven't updated the site yet. Mike Begin forwarded message: > An Important Message From Comcast > > Dear Comcast Customer, > > Thank you for volunteering to participate in Comcast's IPv6 trials! I wanted > to provide you with a q

Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials

2010-01-31 Thread Joel Jaeggli
rom: "George Bonser" >>> >>>> -Original Message- >>>> From: William McCall >>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 7:51 PM >>>> Subject: Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials >>>> >>>> Saw this today too. This is a good s

Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials

2010-01-29 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:50:22 EST, Steven Bellovin said: > In all seriousness, will any attempt be made to select trial applicants > based on (apparent) clue level and/or to receive feedback through > channels other than the usual Tier 1 support? Two comments: 1) People who manage to find out abou

Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials

2010-01-28 Thread Tim Durack
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Chris Gotstein wrote: > Typically the CPE address is private, not sure why they would use a > public IP.  The MTA (VoIP) part of the modem would need a public IP if > it was talking to a SIP server that was not on the same network.  Most > smaller cable system outs

Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials

2010-01-28 Thread Chris Gotstein
Typically the CPE address is private, not sure why they would use a public IP. The MTA (VoIP) part of the modem would need a public IP if it was talking to a SIP server that was not on the same network. Most smaller cable system outsource their VoIP to a reseller with a softswitch. ---

Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials

2010-01-28 Thread Kevin Oberman
:12 > >> To: Richard Barnes > >> Cc: NANOG > >> Subject: Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials > > > > > > > >> But then that begs the question of why lots of other very large retail > >> Internet access providers have not indicated that they'r

Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials

2010-01-28 Thread Joe Hamelin
steve pirk:> Does G4 count? I have seen fliers from Comcast talking about mobile G4 Comcast is using Clearwire for 4G. Seattle 4G rolled-out about 2 weeks ago. Many more markets to be turned-up this spring. No IPv6 in the configs at this time, but most of the core seems capable. Clear is layer-

Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials

2010-01-28 Thread steve pirk [egrep]
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 22:55, George Bonser wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Kevin Oberman [mailto:ober...@es.net] > > Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 9:56 PM > > To: George Bonser > > Cc: William McCall; nanog@nanog.org > > Subjec

Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials

2010-01-28 Thread Tim Durack
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Joakim Aronius wrote: > Excuse the newbie question: Why use public IP space for local CPE management > and VoIP? Doesn't DOCSIS support traffic separation? > > /J > > Probably because rfc1918 is only 2^24+2^20+2^16 = 17,891,328 (assuming I got them all and my ma

Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials

2010-01-28 Thread tvest
On Jan 28, 2010, at 9:07 AM, TJ wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: tv...@eyeconomics.com [mailto:tv...@eyeconomics.com] >> Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 08:12 >> To: Richard Barnes >> Cc: NANOG >> Subject: Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials > > &g

RE: Comcast IPv6 Trials

2010-01-28 Thread TJ
> -Original Message- > From: tv...@eyeconomics.com [mailto:tv...@eyeconomics.com] > Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 08:12 > To: Richard Barnes > Cc: NANOG > Subject: Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials > But then that begs the question of why lots of other very large ret

Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials

2010-01-28 Thread Joakim Aronius
* Paul Stewart (pstew...@nexicomgroup.net) wrote: > That really makes sense - on an incredibly smaller scale (and I mean MUCH > smaller scale), we operate cable modem in two small communities - currently > we use 3 IP addresses per subscriber. One for the cable modem itself, one > for the subsc

RE: Comcast IPv6 Trials

2010-01-28 Thread Scott Berkman
8301-1035_3-10215445-94.html http://unbelievablyfair.com/ -Scott -Original Message- From: George Bonser [mailto:gbon...@seven.com] Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 1:56 AM To: Kevin Oberman Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: Comcast IPv6 Trials > -Original Message

RE: Comcast IPv6 Trials

2010-01-28 Thread TJ
> -Original Message- > From: Richard Barnes [mailto:richard.bar...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 07:47 > To: Kevin Oberman > Cc: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials > > What I've heard is that the driver is IPv4 exhaustion:

RE: Comcast IPv6 Trials

2010-01-28 Thread Paul Stewart
nuary 28, 2010 7:47 AM To: Kevin Oberman Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials What I've heard is that the driver is IPv4 exhaustion: Comcast is starting to have enough subscribers that it can't address them all out of 10/8 -- ~millions of subscribers, each with >1 IP

Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials

2010-01-28 Thread tvest
at 12:55 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote: >>> Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 20:59:16 -0800 >>> From: "George Bonser" >>> >>>> -Original Message- >>>> From: William McCall >>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 7:51 PM >>>&

Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials

2010-01-28 Thread Richard Barnes
Kevin Oberman wrote: >> Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 20:59:16 -0800 >> From: "George Bonser" >> >> > -Original Message- >> > From: William McCall >> > Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 7:51 PM >> > Subject: Re: Comcast IPv6

Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials

2010-01-28 Thread David Freedman
John Jason Brzozowski wrote: > Folks, > > I am emailing you today to share some news that we hope you will find > interesting. > > Today we are announcing our 2010 IPv6 trial plans. For more information > please visit the following web site: I was privileged enough to visit the Comcast DOCSIS3/

RE: Comcast IPv6 Trials

2010-01-27 Thread George Bonser
> -Original Message- > From: Kevin Oberman [mailto:ober...@es.net] > Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 9:56 PM > To: George Bonser > Cc: William McCall; nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials > SWAG is wrong. Comcast is a major cable TV, telephone (

Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials

2010-01-27 Thread Kevin Oberman
> Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 20:59:16 -0800 > From: "George Bonser" > > > -Original Message- > > From: William McCall > > Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 7:51 PM > > Subject: Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials > > > > Saw this today too. This

Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials

2010-01-27 Thread Seth Mattinen
On 1/27/2010 15:19, John Jason Brzozowski wrote: > On 1/27/10 5:00 PM, "Bill Fehring" wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 12:52, John Jason Brzozowski >> wrote: >>> There was an adjustment that was required on our end. It is in place. >> Great, got it working, thanks! ...partially Safari/OSX's

Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials

2010-01-27 Thread Tony Varriale
- Original Message - From: "John Jason Brzozowski" To: "Steven Bellovin" Cc: Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 5:12 PM Subject: Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials Thanks. Initially it would be ideal (even preferred) to target trial subscribers with greater IPv6 awareness.

RE: Comcast IPv6 Trials

2010-01-27 Thread George Bonser
> -Original Message- > From: William McCall > Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 7:51 PM > Subject: Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials > > Saw this today too. This is a good step forward for adoption. Without > going too far, what was the driving factor/selling point to moving

Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials

2010-01-27 Thread William McCall
Saw this today too. This is a good step forward for adoption. Without going too far, what was the driving factor/selling point to moving towards this trial? -- William McCall On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 1:23 PM, John Jason Brzozowski wrote: > Folks, > > I am emailing you today to share some news th

Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials

2010-01-27 Thread John Jason Brzozowski
On 1/27/10 5:00 PM, "Bill Fehring" wrote: > On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 12:52, John Jason Brzozowski > wrote: >> There was an adjustment that was required on our end.  It is in place. > Great, got it working, thanks! ...partially Safari/OSX's fault, but > mostly mine for not realizing what was goin

Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials

2010-01-27 Thread John Jason Brzozowski
Thanks. Initially it would be ideal (even preferred) to target trial subscribers with greater IPv6 awareness. The technical team will absolutely remain engaged as part of the support process. HTH, John On 1/27/10 5:50 PM, "Steven Bellovin" wrote: > Wonderful! > > In all seriousness, will a

Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials

2010-01-27 Thread nick hatch
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Steven Bellovin wrote: > Wonderful! > > In all seriousness, will any attempt be made to select trial applicants > based on (apparent) clue level and/or to receive feedback through channels > other than the usual Tier 1 support? > >From http://www.comcast6.net/faq.

Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials

2010-01-27 Thread Steven Bellovin
Wonderful! In all seriousness, will any attempt be made to select trial applicants based on (apparent) clue level and/or to receive feedback through channels other than the usual Tier 1 support?

Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials

2010-01-27 Thread Cameron Byrne
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:23 AM, John Jason Brzozowski wrote: > Folks, > > I am emailing you today to share some news that we hope you will find > interesting. > > Today we are announcing our 2010 IPv6 trial plans.  For more information > please visit the following web site: > > http://www.comcas

Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials

2010-01-27 Thread Bill Fehring
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 12:52, John Jason Brzozowski wrote: > There was an adjustment that was required on our end.  It is in place. Great, got it working, thanks! ...partially Safari/OSX's fault, but mostly mine for not realizing what was going on quickly enough. > Do you have any form of IPv6

Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials

2010-01-27 Thread John Jason Brzozowski
There was an adjustment that was required on our end. It is in place. Do you have any form of IPv6 connectivity? If yes, this is why you are seeing the same portal. This will clear up shortly. John On 1/27/10 3:47 PM, "Bill Fehring" wrote: > On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:23, John Jason Brzozo

Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials

2010-01-27 Thread Bill Fehring
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:23, John Jason Brzozowski wrote: > Folks, > > I am emailing you today to share some news that we hope you will find > interesting. > > Today we are announcing our 2010 IPv6 trial plans.  For more information > please visit the following web site: > > http://www.comcast6.

Comcast IPv6 Trials

2010-01-27 Thread John Jason Brzozowski
Folks, I am emailing you today to share some news that we hope you will find interesting. Today we are announcing our 2010 IPv6 trial plans. For more information please visit the following web site: http://www.comcast6.net We have also made available a partial, dual-stack version of our portal