An important question...
I recall a peering panel at an ISPCON in 1996 when the current
Peering Badguys, BBN, were represented by John, who listened
to a ton of bitching for an hour about the unfairness of it all and
said (paraphrasing)...
"I understand you all have your opinions and desires bu
On Mar 27, 2013, at 6:25 PM, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
> Or worse, before some government somewhere decides to "solve" this
> problem for a value of "solved" involving (shudder) legislation.
In general, governments have avoided regulating various aspects of
the Internet, in part because of lack of u
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 12:30:43PM -0700, Paul Ferguson wrote:
> Consider this a call-to-arms, in all aspects. Please.
+1
No. Not enough. +10.
But...our collective track record in responding in a timely and effective
fashion to such calls is not very good. Twenty years ago we could have
kille
On 3/27/13 2:46 PM, Warren Bailey wrote:
Wasn't there a ton of drama with the SpamHaus guys a year or so ago
regarding RBL's on NANOG?
There's always someone who publicly flips out over being listed by a
major DNSBL at least once a year.
~Seth
that article is absolute rubbish. take with large pinch of salt, rockstar in
hamster outfit type nonsense.
$dayjob didn't lose any traffic during the period, some guys where affected
because of the lottery of being on the same switch as couldfare.
regards,
Neil.
On 27 Mar 2013, at 18:45, "Jay
Wasn't there a ton of drama with the SpamHaus guys a year or so ago
regarding RBL's on NANOG?
On 3/27/13 2:54 PM, "Scott Weeks" wrote:
>
>--- b...@herrin.us wrote:
>From: William Herrin
>
>According to the New York Times it was 300 gbps and Cyberbunker was the
>bad guy.
>http://www.nytimes.co
"...Sven Olaf Kamphuis, an Internet activist who
said he was a spokesman for the attackers..."
I wonder is he'll ever post here again as he has in the past. It
probably would not go well for him if he did...
scott
--- b...@herrin.us wrote:
From: William Herrin
According to the New York Times it was 300 gbps and Cyberbunker was the bad guy.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/27/technology/internet/online-dispute-becomes-internet-snarling-attack.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
-
bps DDOS "that almost broke the Internet"
Try this one:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-21954636
On 3/27/13 3:55 PM, "Scott Weeks" wrote:
>
>
>--- b...@herrin.us wrote:
>From: William Herrin
>
>According to the New York Times it was 300 gbp
Try this one:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-21954636
On 3/27/13 3:55 PM, "Scott Weeks" wrote:
>
>
>--- b...@herrin.us wrote:
>From: William Herrin
>
>According to the New York Times it was 300 gbps and Cyberbunker was the
>bad guy.
>http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/27/technology/internet/o
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
> According to the New York Times it was 300 gbps and Cyberbunker was the bad
> guy.
> http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/27/technology/internet/online-dispute-becomes-internet-snarling-attack.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
> -
--- b...@herrin.us wrote:
From: William Herrin
According to the New York Times it was 300 gbps and Cyberbunker was the bad guy.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/27/technology/internet/online-dispute-becomes-internet-snarling-attack.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Joshua Goldbard wrote:
> That was a really big attack.
>
> The scary part is that it's all DNS reflection, meaning the attackers only
> need 3Gbps of bandwidth to generate 300Gbps of DDoS.
>
> Imagine if they compromised some of the medium sized corporate networ
As cyberbunker stops killing spamhaus and goes after Gilmore.. I think
these are the guys who used to colo HavenCo after they burnt their
platform down? I'm not sure how I feel about Cloudflare comparing being
packeted to a nuclear bomb? After the packeting drys up, is there really
total devastatio
You won't care "who" until the target is you. ;)
Warm Regards,
Jordan Michaels
On 03/27/2013 12:09 PM, Warren Bailey wrote:
Seldom do hax0r nations target things without some type of
"justification". I don't really care who is being internet murdered, I
care why.
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Warren Bailey
wrote:
> Is someone pissed off at Spamhaus, or was the intention to packet them so
> hard their entire network ceased to exist so they can no longer offer
> DROP/RBL/xyz service?
According to the New York Times it was 300 gbps and Cyberbunker was the
That was a really big attack.
The scary part is that it's all DNS reflection, meaning the attackers only need
3Gbps of bandwidth to generate 300Gbps of DDoS.
Imagine if they compromised some of the medium sized corporate networks along
with these Botnets. I don't know if the exchanges could hol
Is someone pissed off at Spamhaus, or was the intention to packet them so
hard their entire network ceased to exist so they can no longer offer
DROP/RBL/xyz service?
Seldom do hax0r nations target things without some type of
"justification". I don't really care who is being internet murdered, I
ca
http://blog.cloudflare.com/the-ddos-that-almost-broke-the-internet
Yes: 120 gigabits/second, primarily of DNS amplification traffic.
Still think it's optional to implement BCP38 pervasively?
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink j...@baylink.com
Design
19 matches
Mail list logo
