Re: China Network Diversity

2020-01-17 Thread Stephen M
55 AM To: Gabe Cole; JASON BOTHE Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: China Network Diversity I think the issue is mainland China, not Hong Kong or Singapore. From: NANOG on behalf of JASON BOTHE via NANOG Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2020 5:30 PM To: Gabe Cole Cc:

Re: China Network Diversity

2020-01-16 Thread Rod Beck
I think the issue is mainland China, not Hong Kong or Singapore. From: NANOG on behalf of JASON BOTHE via NANOG Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2020 5:30 PM To: Gabe Cole Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: China Network Diversity I’ve had good luck with PCCW

Re: China Network Diversity

2020-01-16 Thread Rod Beck
I have experienced the same thing. I think it is motivated by national security paranoia. Regards, Roderick. From: NANOG on behalf of Gabe Cole Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2020 3:10 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: China Network Diversity We are trying to

Re: China Network Diversity

2020-01-16 Thread JASON BOTHE via NANOG
I’ve had good luck with PCCW operating as my China liaison since we terminate a lot of circuits in Hong Kong and Singapore. It’s not cheap I’ll tell ya but they can get the info and deliver. J~ > On Jan 16, 2020, at 10:21, Gabe Cole wrote: > >  > We are trying to design a physically diverse

China Network Diversity

2020-01-16 Thread Gabe Cole
We are trying to design a physically diverse network in China and have been challenged.  All of the major carriers say that they cannot provide us KMZs or similar detailed route information.  Has anyone been able to crack this code? G. Gabriel Cole *RTE Group, Inc.* *Strategic Consulting for Mis