Re: Change re ARIN RPKI Relying Party TAL access

2016-02-05 Thread John Curran
On Feb 5, 2016, at 10:52 AM, William Herrin wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Job Snijders wrote: >> Can you explain in layman terms what the legal consequences of this >> change are? > > Hi Job, > > In layman's terms, the difference is that you're now free to deal with > the RPKI TA

Re: Change re ARIN RPKI Relying Party TAL access

2016-02-05 Thread William Herrin
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Job Snijders wrote: > Can you explain in layman terms what the legal consequences of this > change are? Hi Job, In layman's terms, the difference is that you're now free to deal with the RPKI TAL the same way you deal with the legal issues surrounding access to A

Re: Change re ARIN RPKI Relying Party TAL access

2016-02-05 Thread John Curran
On Feb 5, 2016, at 8:44 AM, Job Snijders wrote: > > Dear John, > > On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 08:15:29PM +, John Curran wrote: >> One of the concerns raised at a previous NANOG was with respect to the >> need for an RPKI relying parties to explicitly accept ARIN's relying >> party agreement (RP

Re: Change re ARIN RPKI Relying Party TAL access

2016-02-05 Thread Job Snijders
Dear John, On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 08:15:29PM +, John Curran wrote: > One of the concerns raised at a previous NANOG was with respect to the > need for an RPKI relying parties to explicitly accept ARIN's relying > party agreement (RPA) - note that this has now been changed (per the > attached

Change re ARIN RPKI Relying Party TAL access

2016-02-04 Thread John Curran
NANOGers - One of the concerns raised at a previous NANOG was with respect to the need for an RPKI relying parties to explicitly accept ARIN's relying party agreement (RPA) - note that this has now been changed (per the attached announcement) Wile the RPA terms remain the