Yes, obviously it was meant to be 193.169.24.0 - 193.169.25.255
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Hayes [mailto:ryguill...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2009 9:22 PM
To: na...@merit.edu; n...@ripe.net
Subject: Re: Broken RIPE-entry
That would indeed be a very large allocation. :)
On
That would indeed be a very large allocation. :)
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Andreas Plesner Jacobsen wrote:
> I thought this may be of interest to anybody who uses the RIPE db for
> automated purposes. Somebody seems to have done a friday slip-up and
> entered this in the RIPE db:
>
> inetn
I thought this may be of interest to anybody who uses the RIPE db for
automated purposes. Somebody seems to have done a friday slip-up and
entered this in the RIPE db:
inetnum:93.169.24.0 - 193.169.25.255
netname:CENTRSVYAZ-NET
descr: Centrsvyaz CJSC
country:RU
--
3 matches
Mail list logo
