On 20 December 2017 at 15:52, Saku Ytti wrote:
> On 20 December 2017 at 16:55, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
>
>> And for me, it sounds like faulty aggregation + shaping setup, for example,
>> i heard once if i do policing on some models of Cisco switch, on an
>> aggregated interface, if it has 4 i
Hi,
sounds like you are hosting the origin for the CDN which causes issues.
Does the CDN care where it is pulling the data from?
Could you place a cheaper origin somewhere else? Like AWS, Italy,
Katar or Amsterdam? For 150k/month you can get a lot of
bandwidth/storage/rack space somewhere else.
An
This is based on feedback from a colleague that spent several years in
Lebanon and did a fair amount of research into the AS-adjacency paths in
and out of the country, and the OSI layer 1 (submarine fiber to Cyprus,
etc) paths...
It sounds to me like your upstream carrier does not actually have an
Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote on 12/20/2017 12:07 PM:
Still, i am running some dedicated servers on colo in EU/US, some over
10G(bonding),
and _single_ ip on server, i never faced such balancing issues, thats
why i am asking,
if someone had such carrier, who require to balance bandwidth between
m
On 20 December 2017 at 20:34, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> As you can see max single ip takes is 4.48% of bandwidth.
> Also i cannot waste ipv4 for larger pools, just because of some deadly
> flawed equipment/configuration.
This indeed sounds unacceptable. I would suspect intentional
per-prefix
<>
Are you claiming that your bandwidth is being equally divided 1024
ways (you mentioned a /22) or just that each host (IP) is not
receiving the full bandwidth? What is the bandwidth ordered and what
is the bandwidth you're seeing per host(IP)?
Some facts from today.
Ordered capacity 3.3Gbit
R
On 2017-12-20 19:12, Saku Ytti wrote:
On 20 December 2017 at 19:04, Denys Fedoryshchenko
wrote:
As person who is in love with embedded systems development, i just
watched
today beautiful 10s of meters long 199x machine, where multi kW VFDs
manage
huge motors(not steppers), dragging synchrono
Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote on 12/20/2017 11:38 AM:
On 2017-12-20 19:16, Blake Hudson wrote:
Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote on 12/20/2017 8:55 AM:
National operator here ask customers to distribute bandwidth between
all ip's equally, e.g. if i have /22, and i have in it CDN from one
of the big con
On 2017-12-20 19:16, Blake Hudson wrote:
Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote on 12/20/2017 8:55 AM:
National operator here ask customers to distribute bandwidth between
all ip's equally, e.g. if i have /22, and i have in it CDN from one of
the big content providers, this CDN use only 3 ips for ingress
Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote on 12/20/2017 8:55 AM:
National operator here ask customers to distribute bandwidth between
all ip's equally, e.g. if i have /22, and i have in it CDN from one of
the big content providers, this CDN use only 3 ips for ingress
bandwidth, so bandwidth distribution is no
On 20 December 2017 at 19:04, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> As person who is in love with embedded systems development, i just watched
> today beautiful 10s of meters long 199x machine, where multi kW VFDs manage
> huge motors(not steppers), dragging synchronously and printing on thin paper
> wit
On 2017-12-20 17:52, Saku Ytti wrote:
On 20 December 2017 at 16:55, Denys Fedoryshchenko
wrote:
And for me, it sounds like faulty aggregation + shaping setup, for
example,
i heard once if i do policing on some models of Cisco switch, on an
aggregated interface, if it has 4 interfaces it will
On 20 December 2017 at 16:55, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> And for me, it sounds like faulty aggregation + shaping setup, for example,
> i heard once if i do policing on some models of Cisco switch, on an
> aggregated interface, if it has 4 interfaces it will install 25% policer on
> each interf
lund
Chicago IL
>-Original Message-
>From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces+snaslund=medline@nanog.org] On Behalf Of
>Denys Fedoryshchenko
>Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2017 8:56 AM
>To: nanog@nanog.org
>Subject: Bandwidth distribution per ip
>
>National operator here ask cu
National operator here ask customers to distribute bandwidth between all
ip's equally, e.g. if i have /22, and i have in it CDN from one of the
big content providers, this CDN use only 3 ips for ingress bandwidth, so
bandwidth distribution is not equal between ips and i am not able to use
all m
15 matches
Mail list logo
