On Mon, 27 Feb 2023 at 22:20, Jeff Tantsura wrote:
> FRR hasn’t implemented RFC4364 (nor planning to my knowledge (unless someone
> comes and codes it ;-))
$ grep -P -r -i 'IANA_SAFI_.* = 1\d{2,}' frr
frr/lib/iana_afi.h: IANA_SAFI_MPLS_VPN = 128,
frr/lib/iana_afi.h: IANA_SAFI_FLOWSPEC = 133
No
On Mon, 27 Feb 2023 at 22:20, Jeff Tantsura wrote:
> FRR hasn’t implemented RFC4364 (nor planning to my knowledge (unless someone
> comes and codes it ;-))
$ grep -P -r -i 'IANA_SAFI_.* = 1\d{2,}' frr
frr/lib/iana_afi.h: IANA_SAFI_MPLS_VPN = 128,
frr/lib/iana_afi.h: IANA_SAFI_FLOWSPEC = 133
No
> On Feb 27, 2023, at 1:18 PM, Jeff Tantsura wrote:
>
> FRR hasn’t implemented RFC4364 (nor planning to my knowledge (unless someone
> comes and codes it ;-))
> I believe - Arccus has implemented it (Keyur to confirm).
Confirming the implementation support on ArcOS (from Arrcus). :)
Best Re
On Sun, 26 Feb 2023 at 21:48, Douglas Fischer wrote:
> But I'm looking for an open-source engine that supports it.
>
> The official FRR documentation does not mention anything about RFC 4364, or
> RTFilter address family.
> So, I think FRR does not support RTFilter Constrained Route Distribution.
On 26/02/2023 21.46, Douglas Fischer wrote:
> However, I'm searching for BGP Engines that implement this address-family
> (AFI=1, SAFI=132), to avoid Lock-In.
>
> But I'm looking for an open-source engine that supports it.
rustybgp and gobgp might support it.
$ grep -r -P "AFI,SAFI = 1,132" ru
> RFC4364 ... I believe - Arccus has implemented it (Keyur to confirm)
i am not keyur and do not play one on the net, but ...
FRR hasn’t implemented RFC4364 (nor planning to my knowledge (unless someone
comes and codes it ;-))
I believe - Arccus has implemented it (Keyur to confirm).
Cheers,
Jeff
> On Feb 26, 2023, at 22:58, Paul Rolland wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>> On Sun, 26 Feb 2023 17:46:42 -0300
>> Douglas Fischer
Hello,
On Sun, 26 Feb 2023 17:46:42 -0300
Douglas Fischer wrote:
> But I'm looking for an open-source engine that supports it.
>
> The official FRR documentation does not mention anything about RFC 4364,
> or RTFilter address family.
> So, I think FRR does not support RTFilter Constrained Route
We are implementing an interesting L3VPN scenario for distributed DFZ on
mid-size PEs.
And we believe that the RT Constrained Route Distribution, RFC4684, will be
ideal to solve the problems of operational levels for the intervention of
configurations between PEs and Route-Reflectors.
However, I'
9 matches
Mail list logo