On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 12:43 PM David Conrad wrote:
> In some cases, there was a ‘caretaker’ assigned (ARRL for 44/8 and @Home
> for 24/8) who acted as a pseudo-registry: they did (or at least were
supposed
> to do) sub-assignments for entities that met (IANA- and pseudo-registry-)
> defined crit
Jimmy,
I have been staying out of this particular food fight, but speaking purely in a
personal capacity as someone who had a small role in early addressing stuff
ages ago, I did want to clarify a couple of things:
On Jul 23, 2019, at 11:05 AM, Jimmy Hess wrote:
> People sought an
> allocation
2 matches
Mail list logo
