Re: AT&T via Tata and Level3

2011-03-03 Thread Robert Bonomi
> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 14:12:16 -0600 > From: Richard A Steenbergen > Subject: Re: AT&T via Tata and Level3 > Cc: nanog@nanog.org > > On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 11:15:51AM -0500, Morgan Miskell wrote: > > I've noticed that we have thousands of routes for AT&T

Re: AT&T via Tata and Level3

2011-03-03 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 11:15:51AM -0500, Morgan Miskell wrote: > I've noticed that we have thousands of routes for AT&T via Tata that > we don't have from AT&T through Level3. I would expect Level3 to have > most of the routes for AT&T that Tata does since they are both > directly peered with

AT&T via Tata and Level3

2011-03-03 Thread Morgan Miskell
I've noticed that we have thousands of routes for AT&T via Tata that we don't have from AT&T through Level3. I would expect Level3 to have most of the routes for AT&T that Tata does since they are both directly peered with AT&T. This seems to have started around midnight last nigh