Re: ARIN RPKI Trust Anchor Issue

On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 04:03:58PM +0100, Simon Leinen wrote: > > It is interesting that the 'trigger event' happened two days ago, > > but it is only just now that it became quite tangible! It seems this > > anomaly could've been alerted for earlier on. > > Can you elaborate how? (Looking for ove

Re: ARIN RPKI Trust Anchor Issue

Dear Job, > I analysed the alert, here is my assessment. Thanks a lot for the analysis. I had also received the alert (Randy Bush and others as well, see "Subject: TA Malfunction??" thread :-) and was wondering... your analysis makes sense as far as I can judge (which is not very far). [...] >

Re: ARIN RPKI Trust Anchor Issue

: Thursday, January 30, 2025 at 07:57 To: Christopher Hawker Cc: NANOG Subject: Re: ARIN RPKI Trust Anchor Issue Dear all, I analysed the alert, here is my assessment. If I recall correctly, Packetvis uses multiple data sources (different versions of validator implementations) and alerts on anomalies

Re: ARIN RPKI Trust Anchor Issue

Dear all, I analysed the alert, here is my assessment. If I recall correctly, Packetvis uses multiple data sources (different versions of validator implementations) and alerts on anomalies spotted by more than a single data source. Most RPKI Validator implementations limit the maximum allowable

ARIN RPKI Trust Anchor Issue

Hello folks, Has anyone received any similar event notifications (from PacketVis or other)? Trying to work out if it's a false-positive. Regards, Christopher Hawker From: PacketVis Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2025 9:40 PM To: Christopher Hawker Subject: bgp ta-