Re: ACX5448

2020-06-09 Thread Mark Tinka
ities, you will have very few issues with the ACX5448. For Layer 2 switching, I have no problems with Broadcom at all. Works a treat, and we are super happy with our Arista switch deployments for this. That said, we did run into Jericho issues with egress policing, where the chip runs out of TC

Re: ACX5448

2020-06-09 Thread Mark Tinka
On 7/Jun/20 00:07, Bryton Herdes wrote: > However many less horror stories than any of the lower-ends in the ACX > line... i.e. 1100.. Juniper are meant to be pushing out the ACX710 which is meant to be better with Broadcom's latest chip sets. I, generally, don't have much faith in merchant

Re: ACX5448

2020-06-08 Thread Brian Johnson
I’ve seen horror stories for almost every platform from every vendor over my time. It usually is caused from using the wrong device for the wrong purpose. If you know its limitations, and use it with in the bounds of its capabilities, you will have very few issues with the ACX5448. - Brian

Re: ACX5448

2020-06-06 Thread Bryton Herdes
;> Hi all >> >> Just curious if anyone on is using the ACX5448 and what their thoughts are >> on it. > > Last time I asked, plenty of horror stories. > > Check the Juniper archives. > > Mark.

Re: ACX5448

2020-06-06 Thread Mark Tinka
On 5/Jun/20 15:21, JASON BOTHE via NANOG wrote: > Hi all > > Just curious if anyone on is using the ACX5448 and what their thoughts are on > it. Last time I asked, plenty of horror stories. Check the Juniper archives. Mark.

ACX5448

2020-06-05 Thread JASON BOTHE via NANOG
Hi all Just curious if anyone on is using the ACX5448 and what their thoughts are on it. Thanks J~