Re: 5.7/5.8 GHz 802.11n dual polarity MIMO through office building glass, 1.5 km distance

2011-02-03 Thread Christopher LILJENSTOLPE
++ On 30Dec2010, at 12.47, Jared Mauch wrote: > > On Dec 29, 2010, at 11:24 AM, Josh Smith wrote: > >> While certainly not the best stuff made I've found the ubiquiti >> equipment to be very nice for the price and have a few of their AP's >> which have been in service 24x7 for a couple of years

Re: 5.7/5.8 GHz 802.11n dual polarity MIMO through office building glass, 1.5 km distance

2010-12-29 Thread Josh Smith
> Combine that with the Linux/SDK stuff and you can do some interesting things > with it that you can't do with other devices. > > - Jared Jared, I don't really have any experience with the Linux/SDK stuff care to share what you're using it for? Thanks, -- Josh Smith KD8HRX email/jabber:  juic

Re: 5.7/5.8 GHz 802.11n dual polarity MIMO through office building glass, 1.5 km distance

2010-12-29 Thread Roy
On 12/29/2010 5:47 PM, Jared Mauch wrote: On Dec 29, 2010, at 11:24 AM, Josh Smith wrote: While certainly not the best stuff made I've found the ubiquiti equipment to be very nice for the price and have a few of their AP's which have been in service 24x7 for a couple of years now. Same here.

Re: 5.7/5.8 GHz 802.11n dual polarity MIMO through office building glass, 1.5 km distance

2010-12-29 Thread Jared Mauch
On Dec 29, 2010, at 11:24 AM, Josh Smith wrote: > While certainly not the best stuff made I've found the ubiquiti > equipment to be very nice for the price and have a few of their AP's > which have been in service 24x7 for a couple of years now. Same here. The price performance is hard (impossi

Re: 5.7/5.8 GHz 802.11n dual polarity MIMO through office building glass, 1.5 km distance

2010-12-29 Thread Josh Smith
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Bryan Fields wrote: > On 12/29/2010 08:19, Robert E. Seastrom wrote: >> >> Most of these regulations are centered on the concern that your >> building not look like a tower site.  An antenna that is sufficiently >> small that it can not be seen from the ground wit

Re: 5.7/5.8 GHz 802.11n dual polarity MIMO through office building glass, 1.5 km distance

2010-12-29 Thread GP Wooden
+1 on Alvarion. - Reply message - From: "Bryan Fields" Date: Wed, Dec 29, 2010 9:30 am Subject: 5.7/5.8 GHz 802.11n dual polarity MIMO through office building glass, 1.5 km distance To: On 12/29/2010 08:19, Robert E. Seastrom wrote: > > Most of these regulations are

Re: 5.7/5.8 GHz 802.11n dual polarity MIMO through office building glass, 1.5 km distance

2010-12-29 Thread Bryan Fields
On 12/29/2010 08:19, Robert E. Seastrom wrote: > > Most of these regulations are centered on the concern that your > building not look like a tower site. An antenna that is sufficiently > small that it can not be seen from the ground without resorting to > optics may be on their "oh, that's fine"

Re: 5.7/5.8 GHz 802.11n dual polarity MIMO through office building glass, 1.5 km distance

2010-12-29 Thread Curtis Maurand
On 12/29/2010 8:19 AM, Robert E. Seastrom wrote: The third consideration is "someone notices and cares". The Nanostation Loco (again from Ubiquiti) is easily capable of the distances that you're talking about and is an all-in-out unit (antenna plus radio, fed with POE) about twice the size of a p

Re: 5.7/5.8 GHz 802.11n dual polarity MIMO through office building glass, 1.5 km distance

2010-12-29 Thread Shane Godmere
On 12/28/2010 11:48 PM, Anonymous List User wrote: For architectural and building management reasons we cannot mount our antennas in a rooftop or outdoor location at either end. The distance between two buildings is 1.5 km, and the fresnel zone is clear. Antennas need to be located indoors at b

Re: 5.7/5.8 GHz 802.11n dual polarity MIMO through office building glass, 1.5 km distance

2010-12-29 Thread Robert E. Seastrom
"Wayne E. Bouchard" writes: > Codes are usually defined in one of two ways... Either "cannot be > above the building parapet" or "cannot be visible from the street > below" (which allows you to position a stant at the center of the roof > so you can clear the parapet) but when talking to buildin

Re: 5.7/5.8 GHz 802.11n dual polarity MIMO through office building glass, 1.5 km distance

2010-12-28 Thread Wayne E. Bouchard
Codes are usually defined in one of two ways... Either "cannot be above the building parapet" or "cannot be visible from the street below" (which allows you to position a stant at the center of the roof so you can clear the parapet) but when talking to building management, it can very easily be, "c

Re: 5.7/5.8 GHz 802.11n dual polarity MIMO through office building glass, 1.5 km distance

2010-12-28 Thread Joel Jaeggli
On 12/28/10 8:48 PM, Anonymous List User wrote: > For architectural and building management reasons we cannot mount our > antennas in a rooftop or outdoor location at either end. The distance > between two buildings is 1.5 km, and the fresnel zone is clear. Antennas > need to be located indoors a

Re: 5.7/5.8 GHz 802.11n dual polarity MIMO through office building glass, 1.5 km distance

2010-12-28 Thread Michael Painter
Anonymous List User wrote: For architectural and building management reasons we cannot mount our antennas in a rooftop or outdoor location at either end. The distance between two buildings is 1.5 km, and the fresnel zone is clear. Antennas need to be located indoors at both ends and will be pla

Re: 5.7/5.8 GHz 802.11n dual polarity MIMO through office building glass, 1.5 km distance

2010-12-28 Thread Justin M. Streiner
On Tue, 28 Dec 2010, Anonymous List User wrote: For architectural and building management reasons we cannot mount our antennas in a rooftop or outdoor location at either end. The distance between two buildings is 1.5 km, and the fresnel zone is clear. Antennas need to be located indoors at bot

5.7/5.8 GHz 802.11n dual polarity MIMO through office building glass, 1.5 km distance

2010-12-28 Thread Anonymous List User
For architectural and building management reasons we cannot mount our antennas in a rooftop or outdoor location at either end. The distance between two buildings is 1.5 km, and the fresnel zone is clear. Antennas need to be located indoors at both ends and will be placed on small speaker stand tr