On 2020-04-18, at 03:08, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
>
> 24x7x365 thus means every hour of 7 years. YES, I know, I know.
Clearly, it means the NOC only operates in the seven years of great abundance
that precede the seven years of famine (Genesis 41:29 etc.). I think I have
seen such NOCs before :-
Rich. I am truly sorry. đź’– also this was great thank you.
-Ben
> On Apr 17, 2020, at 6:09 PM, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
>
> (since it's Friday and we're all stressed)
>
> I can't believe that out of everything I wrote that we're going to discuss
> the semantics of this, but then again: yes I can.
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 6:09 PM Rich Kulawiec wrote:
> 24x7 means every hour of the week, as in "24 by 7".
>
> 24x365 means every hour of the year. (modulo those with 366 days
> but please let's not go there because this is bad enough)
> (oh wait, too late, someone upthread already
(since it's Friday and we're all stressed)
I can't believe that out of everything I wrote that we're going to discuss
the semantics of this, but then again: yes I can. I should have known.
I should have known. I. Should. Have. Known. *bangs head on desk*
*reaches for scotch* Alrighty then:
24
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 3:07 AM Forrest Christian (List Account)
wrote:
> If you're going for accuracy, does 24x365 mean you close one day this year?
> Or should you actually be saying 24x365.25, or even more accurately
> 24x365.2425 (but still not exact).
How can you be that pedantic and not
What?
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 2:48 PM Bryan Fields wrote:
>
> On 4/16/20 4:48 PM, Ben Cannon wrote:
> > Side note: What you describe is in-fact part of how languages change and
> > evolve. (over time, sufficiently common incorrect use becomes. well.
> > correct.)
>
> Top posting will never be
On 4/16/20 4:48 PM, Ben Cannon wrote:
> Side note: What you describe is in-fact part of how languages change and
> evolve. (over time, sufficiently common incorrect use becomes. well.
> correct.)
Top posting will never be correct, even if the entire world does it.
:-)
--
Bryan Fields
727-409
Honestly, sometimes I include the "Three-Hundred Sixty-Five and a Quarter” on
conference calls.
Side note: What you describe is in-fact part of how languages change and
evolve. (over time, sufficiently common incorrect use becomes. well. correct.)
-Ben Cannon
CEO 6x7 Networks & 6x7 Telecom, LL
On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 22:06:52 -0700, Ben Cannon said:
> I call our NOC “24x7x365” I hear that in my head as “twenty-four
> (hour) - BY
> - Seven (days a week) - BY - 365 (days a year, indicating we don’t close on
> any holidays).
x365 is fine, to distinguish from 24x7x360 operations tha
Sorry I can't resist...
If you're going for accuracy, does 24x365 mean you close one day this
year? Or should you actually be saying 24x365.25, or even more accurately
24x365.2425 (but still not exact).
Oh wait, we missed the leap seconds in there, which there isn't any real
way to average out
24x7 is way more common, but does leave ambiguity as to holiday coverage.
(there are some 24x7 businesses that close for holidays).
24x7x365 is on the rise as a way to specify that you’re open holidays too.
End of the day, I’m not sure it matters which one you use.
Likely any Google search for
No. 24x7x365 is fine. Sheesh.
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020, 10:10 PM Ben Cannon wrote:
> So I’m taking this thread for a total test-drive and we’re going down this
> random ally...
>
> I call our NOC “24x7x365” I hear that in my head as “twenty-four (hour) -
> BY - Seven (days a week) - BY - 365 (day
So I’m taking this thread for a total test-drive and we’re going down this
random ally...
I call our NOC “24x7x365” I hear that in my head as “twenty-four (hour) - BY -
Seven (days a week) - BY - 365 (days a year, indicating we don’t close on any
holidays).
Is that really not a thing? I swea
13 matches
Mail list logo
