Re: 2009 IPv4 Address Use Report

2010-03-23 Thread Jeroen van Aart
Christopher Morrow wrote: it's not clear that 1.1.1.0/24 is actually assigned to anyone, RIPE/APNIC were just using for some experiments. Did you actually mean 1.0.0.0/8? Uhm, yes of course. Thanks :-)

Re: 2009 IPv4 Address Use Report

2010-03-23 Thread Christopher Morrow
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Jeroen van Aart wrote: > Interesting statistics. > > It'd be interesting to know what % of newly assigned addresses are used for > fraudulent and illegal purposes such as spam and scamming (how soon and how > frequently will the newly assigned 1.1.1.0/8 block star

Re: 2009 IPv4 Address Use Report

2010-03-23 Thread Jeroen van Aart
Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: [ (Non-cross)posted to NANOG, PPML, RIPE IPv6 wg, Dutch IPv6 TF. Web version for the monospace font impaired and with some links: http://www.bgpexpert.com/addrspace2009.php ] 2009 IPv4 Address Use Report As of January first, 2010, the number of unused IPv4

2009 IPv4 Address Use Report

2010-01-01 Thread Iljitsch van Beijnum
[ (Non-cross)posted to NANOG, PPML, RIPE IPv6 wg, Dutch IPv6 TF. Web version for the monospace font impaired and with some links: http://www.bgpexpert.com/addrspace2009.php ] 2009 IPv4 Address Use Report As of January first, 2010, the number of unused IPv4 addresses is 722.18 million. On