On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Geoff Huston wrote:
>
Perhaps we should have newnog implement a penalty payment
system for registrations; tag an extra $25 "excessive leakage"
charge onto conference registrations for networks that are in the
top 30 list?
I worked at a network that made it onto
- Original Message -
> From: "Graham Beneke"
> Perhaps a "biggest climbers & fallers" list would also have more
> relevance for the regular report. The "Top 30" list doesn't seem to
> change very often... ;-)
"And now... with the top 30 prefixes in the United States for the week ending
O
On 15. Oct 2011, at 19:25 , Geoff Huston wrote:
> Does anyone give a s**t about this any more?
Yes, and if only to tell people that we could do a lot better if we'd care more
about the Net than .. (?)economics(?) ..?
I keep wondering if people generate more elaborated filters based on the overa
On 15/10/2011 21:25, Geoff Huston wrote:
Does anyone give a s**t about this any more?
I do. While most of the content of the actual mail has very little
relevance to me, it does provide useful leverage and motivation to fix
some of the networks where I do have influence.
From what I learn
Ditto, and I do find it informative.
Jim
On Oct 15, 2011, at 10:35 PM, Kyle Creyts wrote:
> I may not read it for the purpose of aggregation, but it is useful data to
> me for other purposes.
>
> As long as there is one person talking and at least one person listening, a
> thread is in order,
I may not read it for the purpose of aggregation, but it is useful data to
me for other purposes.
As long as there is one person talking and at least one person listening, a
thread is in order, and it isn't spam.
On Oct 15, 2011 3:25 PM, "Geoff Huston" wrote:
> From what I learned at the latest
those who read it and follow routing best practicez will continue to do those,
those who havent yet given a shit wont get a sudden dose of exlax after seeing
their asn in it.
--srs (iPad)
On 16-Oct-2011, at 5:47, "joe...@bogus.com" wrote:
> I read it every week. It's a finger on the pulse of
> I read it every week. It's a finger on the pulse of a system on which
> I am totally dependent...
the email i want to see here is "i wuz a polluter, but i read the cidr
report, i haz seen the light, and i'm gonna stop polluting."
no, i am not holding my breath.
randy
I read it every week. It's a finger on the pulse of a system on which I am
totally dependent...
Geoff Huston wrote:
>Does anyone give a s**t about this any more?
>
>From what I learned at the latest NANOG it's very clear that nobody reads this
>any more.
>
>Is there any good reason to persist
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011, Simon Leinen wrote:
Ditto here.
-Hank
Geoff Huston writes:
Does anyone give a s**t about this any more?
I do; I check the weekly increase every week, and check who the top
offenders are. If someone from my vicinity/circles is on the list
(doesn't happen frequently; mor
Geoff Huston writes:
> Does anyone give a s**t about this any more?
I do; I check the weekly increase every week, and check who the top
offenders are. If someone from my vicinity/circles is on the list
(doesn't happen frequently; more often for the BGP updates report than
for CIDR), I may send th
On Oct 15, 2011, at 3:29 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>> From what I learned at the latest NANOG it's very clear that nobody
>> reads this any more.
>
> some read it. we are the frustrated ones.
Some read it. I think everyone on NANOG is frustrated (or not paying
attention).
I would suggest that yo
> From what I learned at the latest NANOG it's very clear that nobody
> reads this any more.
some read it. we are the frustrated ones.
no one seems to act on it.
> Is there any good reason to persist in spamming the nanog list with
> this report?
not clear, sad to say.
i really think that the
Does anyone give a s**t about this any more?
From what I learned at the latest NANOG it's very clear that nobody reads this
any more.
Is there any good reason to persist in spamming the nanog list with this report?
thanks,
Geoff
From what I learned at the latest NANOG it's very clear that nobody reads this
any more.
Is there any good reason to persist in spamming the nanog list with this report?
thanks,
Geoff
16 matches
Mail list logo
