Well, you just made my point.
Just change "cold" for "cyber".
/as
On 8/17/13 9:26 PM, Jayram Déshpandé wrote:
> SDN is not a new concept at all.
>
> Infact since ARPANET days, the notion of centralized control plane had a
> lot of traction. But with Cold war around, It made mor
So, where can I buy those "google switches":
http://www.networking-forum.com/viewtopic.php?f=46&t=29803
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 8:08 PM, Avi Freedman wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Avi Freedman
> wrote:
> > > OK, so it was horrible expect scripts but it worked.
> > Not really.
>
The idea of centralized decision makers doing something (typically
> per flow) has been proposed, in my exp
> On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Avi Freedman wrote:
>
> > No, people never use *flow controllers* for anything.
>
> > People have been doing SDN since before Google was around.
> > OK, so it was horrible expect scripts but it worked.
>
> Not really.
Note I am talking about flow controllers i
SDN is not a new concept at all.
Infact since ARPANET days, the notion of centralized control plane had a
lot of traction. But with Cold war around, It made more sense to push the
control plane intelligence into individual decision points (routers ,
switches , et . al. ). Considering the possibili
On 8/17/2013 7:14 PM, Arturo Servin wrote:
> Hacker will love SDN ...
Yes. Traditional SDN is big, flat layer-2 network with global
mac-address resolution, and a big fat Java applet managing the adjacency
tables.
What could *possibly* go wrong?
Jeff
Hacker will love SDN ...
:)
Bye, bye dumb and resilient network ...
.as
On 8/17/13 8:02 PM, Jimmy Hess wrote:
> A software defined network is one where the forwarding behavior can be
> completely defined
> in software running outside of the devices that perform the forwarding.
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Avi Freedman wrote:
> No, people never use *flow controllers* for anything.
> People have been doing SDN since before Google was around.
> OK, so it was horrible expect scripts but it worked.
>
Not really.
Automatic reconfiguration of routers is not what a softwa
At iMCI (pre-Worldcom) we had scripts that would build all our ATM VC's
for a 400node mesh, would take all night to run :)
-jim
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Avi Freedman wrote:
>
> No, people never use *flow controllers* for anything.
>
> People have been doing SDN since before Google wa
No, people never use *flow controllers* for anything.
People have been doing SDN since before Google was around.
OK, so it was horrible expect scripts but it worked.
Avi
> Unpossible. I heard that no one really uses sdn for anything.
>
> :)
>
> T
Unpossible. I heard that no one really uses sdn for anything.
:)
T
On Aug 17, 2013 2:43 PM, "staticsafe" wrote:
> "We present the design, implementation, and evaluation of B4, a pri-
> vate WAN connecting Google’s data centers across the planet."
>
> - http://cseweb.ucsd.edu/~vahdat/papers/b4-
"We present the design, implementation, and evaluation of B4, a pri-
vate WAN connecting Google’s data centers across the planet."
- http://cseweb.ucsd.edu/~vahdat/papers/b4-sigcomm13.pdf
--
staticsafe
O< ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail - www.asciiribbon.org
Please don't top post.
Please d
12 matches
Mail list logo
