Re: [Nanog] NANOG list changes

2008-04-18 Thread becker
Seems to have forgotten I subscribed to the digest as well. Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device -Original Message- From: Matthew Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 13:22:49 To:NANOG Subject: [Nanog] NANOG list changes OK, looks like they changed servers re

Re: [Nanog] NANOG list changes

2008-04-18 Thread Rob Windsor
Matthew Black wrote: > OK, looks like they changed servers recently. I haven't > been following the list for a few months. They also > changed the message headers and they no longer include > the Sender: header that my filter uses on incoming e-mail. > > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] looks like you c

Re: [Nanog] NANOG list changes

2008-04-18 Thread Gregory Hicks
> From: Matthew Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: NANOG > Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 13:22:49 -0700 > Subject: [Nanog] NANOG list changes > > OK, looks like they changed servers recently. I haven't > been following the list for a few months. They also > changed the

Re: [Nanog] NANOG list changes

2008-04-18 Thread Bill McGonigle
On Apr 18, 2008, at 16:22, Matthew Black wrote: > They also > changed the message headers and they no longer include > the Sender: header that my filter uses on incoming e-mail. > > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This seems to work (for procmail): :0: * ^List-Id:.*nanog\.nanog\.org .Mailing\ Lists.n

[Nanog] NANOG list changes

2008-04-18 Thread Matthew Black
OK, looks like they changed servers recently. I haven't been following the list for a few months. They also changed the message headers and they no longer include the Sender: header that my filter uses on incoming e-mail. Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] matthew black network services california state u