Re: [NANOG] NANOG TEST

2011-07-10 Thread Joe Sniderman
On 07/10/2011 10:03 PM, Steve Feldman wrote: > Another test, sorry for the noise. > Steve Well, at least the fears that nanog would be IPv4 only are unfounded.. Received: from mail.amsl.com (mail.amsl.com [IPv6:2001:1890:1112:1::14])... -- Joe Sniderman

Re: [NANOG] NANOG TEST

2011-07-10 Thread Steve Feldman
Another test, sorry for the noise. Steve

Re: [NANOG] NANOG TEST

2011-07-10 Thread Kristian Erik Hermansen
No. On Jul 10, 2011 7:06 PM, "Michael K. Smith - Adhost" wrote: > Please ignore > > -- > Michael K. Smith - CISSP, GSEC, GISP > Chief Technical Officer - Adhost Internet LLC mksm...@adhost.com > w: +1 (206) 404-9500 f: +1 (206) 404-9050 > PGP: B49A DDF5 8611 27F3 08B9 84BB E61E 38C0 (Key ID: 0x9A9

[NANOG] NANOG TEST

2011-07-10 Thread Michael K. Smith - Adhost
Please ignore -- Michael K. Smith - CISSP, GSEC, GISP Chief Technical Officer - Adhost Internet LLC mksm...@adhost.com w: +1 (206) 404-9500 f: +1 (206) 404-9050 PGP: B49A DDF5 8611 27F3 08B9 84BB E61E 38C0 (Key ID: 0x9A96777D)