[NANOG] [EMAIL PROTECTED] valid (was Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] invalid now)

Hi, On Sat, 17 May 2008 10:20:06 +0930 Mark Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 07 May 2008 12:24:57 -0700 > Nathan Anderson/FSR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -- > This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. > > A message that you sent could not be delivered to

[NANOG] [EMAIL PROTECTED] invalid now (Was Re: Microsoft.com PMTUD black hole?)

On Wed, 07 May 2008 12:24:57 -0700 Nathan Anderson/FSR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here is a brief update on the situation: > > Team. They, in turn, forwarded my message on to > [EMAIL PROTECTED], which generated a ticket # for me and is, as I > understand it, the e-mail address I was lookin

Re: [NANOG] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

That list oaught to be working again in a matter of days. On Sat, 3 May 2008, Justin Sharp wrote: > Hello, > > Forgive me if this has been covered previously. > > I have recently discovered this list and have found it a gold mine of > information. I've now traded 3 hours of my life reading throu

[NANOG] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hello, Forgive me if this has been covered previously. I have recently discovered this list and have found it a gold mine of information. I've now traded 3 hours of my life reading through archives and have even found reference to specific recent outages that my company suffered to which we ne