We use Adtran MX2820s which have been pretty reliable. They are designed
for medium density, so I am not sure if they'll be applicable to your
situation. We pull and trap a fair amount of snmp from them with no
problems.
Jay Nakamura wrote:
> I haven't researched stand alone DS3 mux in a long time
$100M is for the first phase, which I would think would be the initial
deployment of intrusions sensors with out of band data feeds, and the
building of a baseline traffic model. The real question is why do any
critical control networks ever touch anything remotely connected to a
public network? La
Bill Fehring wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 14:59, Murphy, Jay, DOH wrote:
>> "So if the enterprise loses connectivity to one of these two providers, does
>> the provider without working connectivity to the enterprise have mechanism
>> in place to cease originating the address space?"
>> Yes, B
Hve seen it a few times -- usually with enterprise customers who are
unable to manage their own routers and one ISP which has problems
configuring BGP on their client facing equipment.
Dale Cornman wrote:
> Has anyone ever heard of a multi-homed enterprise not running bgp with
> either of 2 provi
Is anyone else seeing cyclops down -- or is it just me?
mtr -c10 -r 131.179.96.253
4. osh-2828-peer.onshore.net 0.0%101.3 1.3 1.2 1.6 0.1
5. ip65-47-181-105.z181-47-65.c 0.0%101.4 2.0 1.3 3.7 0.8
6. ge11-1-4d0.mcr2.chicago-il.u 0.0%102.1 1.7
We currently use nfsen - http://nfsen.sourceforge.net/ -- It works
pretty well, not as fancy as others I've worked with, but provides the
basic analytical needs.
Michael J McCafferty wrote:
> All,
>I am looking for decent netflow analyzer and reporting software with good
> support for AS dat
We are seeing the same ting with 66.146.192.0/19 & 66.251.224.0/19.
According to cyclopes this is still continuing. . .
Dylan Ebner wrote:
> We also received a notification that our IP block 67.135.55.0/24 (AS19629) is
> being annouced by AS9035. Hopefully someone is receiving my emails.
>
> Tha
I am trying to perform some capacity planning for some of our
residential pops, but the old calcs I used to use seem useless -- as
they were adapted from the dialup days and relied upon a percentage of
users online (~50%) and a percentage of concurrent transmission (~19%).
My present scenario invol
We are presently seeing some weird FB behavior -- timeouts and retry
issues. We've had several reports from our users and just began
investigating. Any info you have would be appreciated.
--sjk
Jorge Amodio wrote:
> Are folks seeing any major DOS in progress ?
>
> Twitter seems t
Seeing them off of Sprint now. . . weird
sjk wrote:
> We have seen the route for cisco withdrawn from 208 and 2828. Facebook
> seems fine
>
>
We have seen the route for cisco withdrawn from 208 and 2828. Facebook
seems fine
Dominic J. Eidson wrote:
>
> Both work from Austin, TX.
>
>
>
> - d.
>
> On Tue, 4 Aug 2009, Alex Nderitu wrote:
>
>> Facebook seems to also be affected.
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: R. Benjami
Russell Heilling wrote:
> 2009/5/11 Ricardo Oliveira :
>> Hi all,
>>
>> First, thanks for using Cyclops, and thanks for all the Cyclops users that
>> drop me a message about this.
>>
>> It seems some router in AS13214 decided to originate all the prefixes and
>> send them to AS48285 in the Cayman
I am trying to find hardware for a rebuild of our DS1 cross-connect
frame and can't seem to find much out there. We've got ~300 DS1s that
need to be x-connected between our M13s and I'm seeking an easy to
manage solution. I've looked at the Telect panels but I'm concerned that
my staff can't deal w
13 matches
Mail list logo
