Hi Nanogers,
Any recommendation about a software which check the live config of
cisco/juniper devices against some templates ?
The goal is to have a template about different function device, like:
- CORE device must have this bloc and this clock
- PE device must have at least that and that
- C
Hello,
As all of us know BGP was designed for scalability, thus slow
convergence. But it was also when CPU was slow :-).
What do you think about the standard eBGP hold timer of 180sec ?
Conservative ?
I'm asking because we see more and more peering partners which force the
hold timer to a
related to the discussion about IGP choice, I had a quick look and found
that NX-OS ISIS for IPv6 support is quiet recent. Was not supported on
5.x, but it supported on 7.x (2015).
This might explain why not so many ISP use NX-OS.
On 21.10.2015 08:25, marcel.durega...@yahoo.fr wrote:
Dear
Hi Matthew,
Thank a lot for your answer. This help me to understand, and make more
sense to me :-).
Thanks,
-Marcel
On 23.10.2015 18:31, Matthew Petach wrote:
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 1:41 AM, marcel.durega...@yahoo.fr
wrote:
sorry for that, but the only one I've heard about switchin
by having multiple areas, therefore ABR which deny routers and network
LSA, you introduce summarization (ABR only send summary LSA, mean subnet
info, not topology info) in your network.
Thus you loose informations and do not have a complete topology of your
network. I guess MPLS/TE prefer to sea
same story between HSRP
versus VRRP with better timers for VRRP).
As your doc say (reason to choose ISIS):
better convergence, better security, simplicity.
-Marcel
On 22.10.2015 19:25, Niels Bakker wrote:
* marcel.durega...@yahoo.fr (marcel.durega...@yahoo.fr) [Thu 22 Oct
2015, 18:57 CEST]:
Anyb
Hi everyone,
Anybody from Yahoo to share experience on IGP choice ?
IS-IS vs OSPF, why did you switch from one to the other, for what reason ?
Same question could apply to other ISP, I'd like to heard some
international ISP/carriers design choice, please.
Thank in advance,
Best regards,
-Marce
Dear Nanog'er,
Anybody using NX-OS on MPLS LSR and/or Edge-LSR ?
We are evaluating the replacement of 7600 LSR routers. Our natural
carrier/ISP choice would go for XR everywhere, but we are also curious
about NX-OS on the core.
Why not NX-OS for LSR and XR for Edge-LSR ?
Thank,
-Marcel
Hello
My 2 cents
You can use Wanguard for the detection and A10 for the mitigation, you
have just to play with the API.
Regards
Fabien
Le 12 août 2015 à 16:28, Ramy Hashish a écrit
:
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 08:14:54 +0200
From: "marcel.durega...@yahoo.fr"
To: nanog@nan
your financial guys might think. Could
help you if you want to convince them to buy Arbor :-).
- Marcel
On 12.08.2015 16:28, Ramy Hashish wrote:
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 08:14:54 +0200
From: "marcel.durega...@yahoo.fr"
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Experience on Wanguard for '
ot;NANOG on behalf of marcel.durega...@yahoo.fr"
wrote:
anybody from this impressive list ?:
https://www.andrisoft.com/company/customers
-- Marcel
On 11.08.2015 03:28, Paul Ferguson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 8/10/2015 6:07 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wro
anybody from this impressive list ?:
https://www.andrisoft.com/company/customers
-- Marcel
On 11.08.2015 03:28, Paul Ferguson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 8/10/2015 6:07 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 09:36:07 +1000, Nick Pratley said:
12 matches
Mail list logo
