intergenia ↔ mxlogic connection issues

(dnsad...@mxlogic.com and hostmas...@mcafee.com) but got no answer. Sorry for the noise, Kai

questions about DVFS in saving energy

support? 3) What’s the transition time and cost (power) between these voltages/frequencies? Thanks, -Kai

Re: Can you see these AS links:)

We read and compare our results with the following projs, the new links are those in our dataset not in follows, which is interesting. Note the results come from measurements of extremely large-scale monitors than public available monitors. - Kai On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 3:49 AM, Ricardo Oliveira

Can you see these AS links:)

please contact us off list. Thanks! - Kai

Re: question about BGP default routing

Will this default route 0.0.0.0/0 be exporting to AS-level neighbors? On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 8:49 PM, Edward B. DREGER wrote: > KC> Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 18:05:48 -0600 > KC> From: Kai Chen > > KC> is this router using a default routing for all the other > KC> de

question about BGP default routing

Hi all I have a question: I see very few prefixes in a routing table and combining the prefixes does not cover addresses space, for example, {78.41.184.0/21, 91.103.239.0/24, 91.103.232.0/22, 82.138.64.0/23, 91.103.232.0/21, 77.95.71.0/24} are all prefixes I observed from a BGP speaking router, I

Dmain names for the interfaces of a router

Hi everyone, my question is that, in practice, if there are different interfaces (different IP addresses) on the same border router having different domain names? thanks.

Re: question on BGP aggregation

peaker is likely to have more > detailed path information and can distinguish individual paths > from destinations. > " > > --Ricardo > > On Oct 22, 2008, at 8:17 PM, Kai Chen wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I observe some BGP AS paths collected f

question on BGP aggregation

Hi, I observe some BGP AS paths collected from Routeview having the AS-set in the last hop. According to my understanding, this is BGP route aggregation. However, my question is as follows: Suppose, there is a path AS1 AS2 AS3 {AS4 AS5 AS6}, how AS4 AS5 AS6 connect to AS3? Does it necessarily mean

Re: Is the export policy selective under valley-free?

On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 4:29 AM, William Waites <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Le 08-09-03 à 11:08, Iljitsch van Beijnum a écrit : > >> On 3 sep 2008, at 1:45, Kai Chen wrote: >> >>> Just want to ask a dire

Is the export policy selective under valley-free?

Just want to ask a direct question. Will an AS export all it gets from its customers and itself to its providers? Or even under valley-free, the BGP export policy is also selective? Thanks a lot, -- -Kai

Re: [NANOG] peering between ASes

2008/5/16 Joel Jaeggli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Kai Chen wrote: > >> Hi, here is a quick question. >> 1. Beside public peering in IXP and private peering between two dedicated >> ASes, are there any other interconnection models in the current Internet? >&

[NANOG] peering between ASes

Hi, here is a quick question. 1. Beside public peering in IXP and private peering between two dedicated ASes, are there any other interconnection models in the current Internet? 2. How does private peering implement, just a router from each AS and a link inbetween? Do they have multi-access in one