Re: Carrier Grade NAT

Not exactly what you probably want. But it´s actually working for me: http://ipv6netro.blogspot.de/2013/10/asamap-application-capability-in-wide.html http://enog.jp/~masakazu/vyatta/map/ Am 29.07.2014 16:45, schrieb Colton Conor: We are looking for recommendations for a carrier grade nat solut

Re: 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation

That´s actually a topic, I was thinking ago some time ago. Why not take a current TOR switch with 1. BGP support and 2. high buffer. Like mentioned above we have Trident 2 bases switches. HP (no recommendation) has its HP 5930 series but tells "Routing table size 16000 entries (IPv4), 8000 entries

Re: 10G standalone switch to access in data center, cheap

Well, "cheap" (and new), i.e. - take 1-2 Netgear XSM7224 with 24x 10GBaseT and 4x SFP+ (shared) each - take 1-2 Netgear XSM7224S with 24x SFP+ and 4x 10GBaseT (shared) each or - take 3-6 Netgear XS708E with 8x 10GBaseT and 1x SFP+ (shared) each - take 2-4 Netgear XS712T with 12x 10GBaseT and 2x SF

Re: [Paper] B4: Experience with a Globally-Deployed Software Defined WAN

So, where can I buy those "google switches": http://www.networking-forum.com/viewtopic.php?f=46&t=29803

Re: IPAM

I don´t know Northstar, but if you can export their tables into a *.csv, you can easily import it into http://www.gestioip.net/ Michael Am 07.08.2013 18:41, schrieb Natambu Obleton: > I have customer that we deployed Northstar for their internal ip management > over 8 yrs ago. They are still usi

Re: OSPF Vulnerability - Owning the Routing Table

So, only Cisco and Juniper are hit by this one? What about "the rest"? Michael Am 02.08.2013 21:34, schrieb John Stuppi (jstuppi): > Yes, these advisories (from both Cisco and Juniper), covering CVE-2013-0149, > are both related to the announcement yesterday (1-Aug) at BlackHat regarding > the

Re: IPv6 support by wifi systems

Rather old document from 2010: Cisco + IPv6 over CAPWAP protocol: http://d2zmdbbm9feqrf.cloudfront.net/2012/usa/pdf/BRKEWN-2010.pdf

Re: switch 10G standalone TOR, core to DC

Well, talking about HP´s A5920/A5900 series. Last time I was looking, their virtual routing instances haven´t supported IPv4 multicast, nor IPv6 multicast/unicast, nor any policy based routing. Michael

Re: HP IPv6 RA Guard

Hi, sorry to disappoint you, but there´s a reason why HP bought H3C/3Com. And of course, those switches have some advanced features, as well: - IPV6 DHCP snooping - IPV6 ND detection - IPV6 ND snooping - SAVI (Source Address Validation), http://tools.ietf.org/wg/savi/ Christian >I wonde