e other
would take over.
Please share your thoughts on this.
I would suggest you read the materials here https://learn.nsrc.org/bgp
"Multi-Homing" section. I believe you will find more extensive
documentation about what you are trying to achieve.
--
Willy Manga
ntain a 'Re:' in front, I insert it.
And that is exactly what I'm doing with this reply.
I believe it's not so disruptive at least when I look at the archives
[1], it's not opening a new thread.
1. https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/
Of course, like you I usually
is the more obvious.
The only end-user who might stick with a single /64 is
- 1 smartphone
- 1 VM
--
Willy Manga
roach.
1.
https://www.daryllswer.com/ipv6-architecture-and-subnetting-guide-for-network-engineers-and-operators/
--
Willy Manga
unterpart.
1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813691
2.
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/e022d597-302d-c061-0830-6ed20aa61...@qtmlabs.xyz/T/#u
--
Willy Manga
the
traffic to the unused prefixes. Basically, I guess, it means that the AS
0 solution shouldn't be used, at least not usually. I wonder if anyone
is using it , in fact. It would be nice to know if someone has the data
handy.
https://console.rpki-client.org/AS0.html
--
Willy Manga
@ongo
h more experience than me provide clarifications here.
--
Willy Manga
@ongolaboy
https://ongola.blogspot.com/
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
forget you have
16x/36, 2x/33,4x/34,... You will have to insert statement for every
single of them.
1. https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2023-October/223676.html
--
Willy Manga
@ongolaboy
https://ongola.blogspot.com/
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
as
precise as possible.
--
Willy Manga
@ongolaboy
https://ongola.blogspot.com/
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
nounced in BGP" [1]
1.
https://rpki.readthedocs.io/en/latest/rpki/securing-bgp.html#maximum-prefix-length
--
Willy Manga
@ongolaboy
https://ongola.blogspot.com/
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
se.
A better alternative IMHO is to take advantage to the large prefix range
and advertise a sub-aggregate when necessary. But absolutely not each
end-node or customer prefix.
--
Willy Manga
@ongolaboy
https://ongola.blogspot.com/
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ct ICMP(v6)?
Thanks.
P.S: I sent the same email to dns-operati...@lists.dns-oarc.net since 12
May 2023 but it's still in moderation.. If one admin is around .. :)
--
Willy Manga
@ongolaboy
https://ongola.blogspot.com/
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
( a subset of the previous bullet
point)
--
Willy Manga
@ongolaboy
https://ongola.blogspot.com/
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ble a transition technique.
Thank you in advance :)
--
Willy Manga
@ongolaboy
https://ongola.blogspot.com/
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
.
On 21/03/2021 17:29, Willy Manga wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 21/03/2021 16:00, nanog-requ...@nanog.org wrote:
>> Message: 13
>> Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2021 12:46:57 -0600
>> From: David Siegel
>> [...]
>> The board has been thinking about enhancements to the NANOG
he way), maybe some kind of
'mailing-list 101' can be helpful sometimes. Many $vendors are fighting
hard to make people forget what an email is.
--
Willy Manga
@ongolaboy
https://ongola.blogspot.com/
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
> other can, and the things that don't have to, can't. I did a lot of
> large multinational corporations using this type of design and never
> even came close to exhausting 1918 space.
Here comes your firewall rules and all your ACL ... easier with IPv6 imho
--
Willy Manga
@ongolaboy
https://ongola.blogspot.com/
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
For existing members".
It is said "No additional fees as a result of the issued IPv6 prefix
will apply."
Section 3.2. new IPv6-only members get discounts over 3 years
--
Willy Manga
@ongolaboy
https://ongola.blogspot.com/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
t. In this kind of environment there
> needs to be a strong case to invest the capex to support IPv6.
>
> IPv6 must be supported on the CxO level in order to be deployed.
I would have said the very very minimum could be to invest in a
dual-stack 'proxy' for public-facing serv
ck.
> Disabling it immediately solves the issue.
>
> Quite odd that this is happening in 2018...
IMHO the issue is in the network somewhere ...
--
Willy Manga
@ongolaboy
https://ongola.blogspot.com/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
1 and
2606:4700:4700:: )
--
Willy Manga
@ongolaboy
https://ongola.blogspot.com/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
tomer) ?
--
Willy Manga (from where I stand mobile operators do not use yet v6 :-\ )
freenode: ongolaBoy
Ubuntu Cameroonian Loco Team
https://launchpad.net/~manga-willy
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
22 matches
Mail list logo