Apologies for the off-topic chatter...
-wil
On May 26, 2011 7:54 PM, "David Conrad" wrote:
>
> On May 26, 2011, at 4:50 PM, Wil Schultz wrote:
> > There are some similarities between bands and ipv4 exhaustion, sure...
One
> > major difference is that those using ipv4 have the option of using ipv6,
>
>
On May 26, 2011 3:08 PM, "Jaime Magiera" wrote:
>
>
>
>from our cold dead hands.
>
>
> kd8mzn
>
I haven't read the entire thread, but since everyone with a call sign is
checking in...
There are some similarities between bands and ipv4 exhaustion, sure... One
major difference is that th
On May 18, 2011, at 5:42 AM, Rogelio wrote:
> I've got about 1000 people hammering a Linux gateway with http
> requests, but only about 150 of them are authenticated users for the
> ISP.
>
> Once someone authenticates, then I want their traffic to pass through
> okay. But if they're not an authe
On May 10, 2011, at 10:56 AM, Steven Bellovin wrote:
>
> On May 10, 2011, at 9:07 11AM, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
>
>
> Has anyone converted that file to some useful format like ASCII? You know
> -- something greppable?
>
I've converted it to ascii, but I don't have a place to host it.
I can
On Apr 21, 2011, at 12:11 PM, Jeroen van Aart wrote:
> valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
>> Well, 33.6k is a Bad Idea right there. :) But if you're stuck with that
>> for technical reasons, but need a VPN for security reasons, it won't
>> be all *that* much worse, unless you're doing a lot of SSH or
On Mar 31, 2011, at 6:14 PM, "Joao C. Mendes Ogawa"
wrote:
> FYI
>
> --Jonny Ogawa
>
> - Forwarded message from Stephen H. Inden -
>
> From: Stephen H. Inden
> Subject: IPv4 Address Exhaustion Effects on the Earth
> Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 00:19:08 +0200
> To: Global Environment Watch (
On Mar 30, 2011, at 4:55 PM, Wil Schultz wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 30, 2011, at 4:39 PM, Alexander Harrowell
> wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday 29 Mar 2011 17:54:27 Wil Schultz wrote:
>>> On Mar 29, 2011, at 3:51 AM, Franck Martin wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
On Mar 30, 2011, at 4:39 PM, Alexander Harrowell wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 Mar 2011 17:54:27 Wil Schultz wrote:
>> On Mar 29, 2011, at 3:51 AM, Franck Martin wrote:
>>
>>
>> And here's a breakdown of which user agents are seen on which ip, as you can
> see t
On Mar 29, 2011, at 3:51 AM, Franck Martin wrote:
>
>
> On 3/29/11 10:18 , "Wil Schultz" wrote:
>
>> I'm attempting to find out information on the SEO implications of testing
>> ipv6 out.
>>
>>
>> 3) ??? Any others that I haven
On Mar 28, 2011, at 3:55 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> On Mar 28, 2011, at 3:18 PM, Wil Schultz wrote:
>
>> I'm attempting to find out information on the SEO implications of testing
>> ipv6 out.
>>
>> A couple of concerns that come to mind are:
>>
I'm attempting to find out information on the SEO implications of testing ipv6
out.
A couple of concerns that come to mind are:
1) www.domain.com and ipv6.domain.com are serving the exact same content.
Typical SEO standards are to only serve good content from a single domain so
information isn
On Mar 25, 2011, at 6:37 AM, Feargal.Ledwidge wrote:
>>
>> Basically, going to www.google.com/ncs will enable No Country Redirect.
>>
>
> I think you meant www.google.com/ncr
>
>
Definitely.
Definitely been going on for a while now.
http://seclists.org/nanog/2011/Mar/108
Here's some more information:
http://www.google.com/support/websearch/bin/answer.py?answer=873
Basically, going to www.google.com/ncs will enable No Country Redirect.
-wil
On Mar 24, 2011, at 5:28 PM, Nathan Eise
I use this Nagios plugin for up/down status alerts, it has some support for
interface bandwidth (and errors/discards) monitoring. It's just a perl script
so you could easily modify it to suit your needs.
http://nagios.manubulon.com/snmp_int.html
-wil
On Mar 12, 2011, at 5:51 AM, Deric Kwok w
Has anyone else had complaints that www.google.com is occasionally redirecting
(http 302) to www.google.com.hk this morning?
-wil
On Mar 2, 2011, at 6:31 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Christopher Morrow"
>
>> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Wil Schultz
>> wrote:
>>> ns1.twtelecom.net and ns2.twtelecom.net (along with some other DNS
On Mar 2, 2011, at 11:17 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Wil Schultz wrote:
>> ns1.twtelecom.net and ns2.twtelecom.net (along with some other DNS servers,
>> ns1.orng.twtelecom.net and ns1.ptld.twtelecom.net) suddenly stopped serving
>> DNS
ns1.twtelecom.net and ns2.twtelecom.net (along with some other DNS servers,
ns1.orng.twtelecom.net and ns1.ptld.twtelecom.net) suddenly stopped serving DNS
for domains it's not authoritative for this morning. Requests are being
actively refused from within their network.
Caused a small issue fo
It's been a fun ride, adios good friend.
-wil
On Feb 3, 2011, at 6:35 AM, Scott Howard wrote:
> 102/8 AfriNIC2011-02whois.afrinic.net ALLOCATED
> 103/8 APNIC 2011-02whois.apnic.net ALLOCATED
> 104/8 ARIN 2011-02whois.arin.netALLOCATED
> 179/8 LACNIC
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.tech/22557
This appears to be some serious FUD, but if true could have some serious
implications for IPSEC stacks in all kinds of equipment.
-wil
Unknown if this is due to the recent doings of late, but it appears as if
Amazon Europe appears to be down.
The anon's are definitely trying to cause disruptions, I find it difficult to
believe that they are the actual cause. Time will tell.
-wil
On Dec 9, 2010, at 9:39 PM, George Bonser wrote:
>
>
>>> Speaking of IPV6 security, is there any movement towards any open
>> source
>>> IPV6 firewall solutions for the consumer / small business?
>>>
>>> Almost all the info I've managed to find to date indicates no
>> support, nor
>>> any plann
Any Greybar should have them, but they're not going to do you any favors on
price.
-wil
On Nov 30, 2010, at 5:32 AM, Christopher J. Pilkington wrote:
> Anyone know where I can buy cage nuts and rack screws locally
> near SAVVIS DC3 in Sterling, VA? They don't seem to have a
> local supply her
Sounds like you're using 32bit counters, create a new graph of the interface
using 64bit counters in cacti.
-wil
On Nov 29, 2010, at 6:24 AM, Peter Rudasingwa
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a cacti server running and it has been working fine so far except for
> one interface which has an average
Yes, we've all read your "blog".
Good thing this isn't an operations list or anything.
-wil
On Nov 28, 2010, at 8:06 PM, Andrew Kirch wrote:
> On 11/28/2010 10:52 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010, Ken Chase wrote:
>>
>>> This is always the best way to deal with disagreement.
DOS is probably because they released some more stuff.
"Secret US Embassy Cables"
http://cablegate.wikileaks.org/
-wil
On Nov 28, 2010, at 1:38 PM, James Downs wrote:
>
> On Nov 28, 2010, at 1:34 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>
>> anyone know why https://www.wikileaks.org/ is not reachable? nations
This helps tons.
speedguide.net has some registry 'tweeks' for different versions of windows.
Also Win7 had the ability to turn on a FASTTCP type of congestion management
called Compound TCP. I haven't tried the windows version so ymmv, but I have
experienced great success by changing the con
The more I think about this COICA deal the more I can't even fathom how it
could be implemented.
If an upstream server won't resolve, what's to stop a network admin from using
an offshored DNS server, or even the root servers?
Unless we're talking about keeping DNS traffic confined to the ISP'
Appears that it's a CNAME for shop.starwars.novator2.com.
The expiry day is 11/22/2011, so if I were to guess I would think that the
domain expired, sent to an advert page, and was just renewed.
-wil
On Nov 22, 2010, at 7:46 AM, Matt Disuko wrote:
>
> It seems the subdomain "shop.starwars.c
Thank you for all of the replies, the response has been overwhelming. :-)
I think we're going to be able to do some good stuff with this "junk", i'm
going to start contacting some folks and get things going here shortly.
Thank you!
-wil
Begin forwarded message:
> Fr
I apologize for being somewhat off topic...
I've got a fair amount of SPARC hardware (v210 through v490) and 32bit HP
DL360-380 hardware that I'm looking for creative ways to dispose of or to
donate.
It seems like a waste to send it to metal scrap, if anyone has a more creative
way of disposal
Just cleared up here in the Bay Area, California.
-wil
On Jan 31, 2009, at 7:16 AM, steven.glog...@swisscom.com wrote:
seems to be a global problem. even here in switzerland... i barely
hear already "the internet is broken":)
-steven
Am 31.01.2009 um 16:02 schrieb "Adam Young"
:
Pete
Yup, google's gone craaazy.
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3089/3241488702_9a9a994f07.jpg
-wil
On Jan 31, 2009, at 6:50 AM, Peter Beckman wrote:
This morning whilest Googling, I got a bunch of "Permission Denied" to
"/interstitial?..." URLs on Google.
Then all my search results got listed as
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/outages/2009-January/001101.html
-wil
On Jan 28, 2009, at 12:27 PM, John Martinez wrote:
http://www.internetpulse.net/
If anyone is interested, here's what things look like from here for
the past 3 days.
dns2:~ wschultz$ gzcat /var/log/named.log.01262009.gz |awk '/\.\/NS\/
IN.*denied/{print $6}' |sed -e 's/#.*//g' |sort |uniq -c |sort -n
6 150.69.136.10
1387 76.9.16.171
2759 63.217.28.226
98680 206.71.158.3
Anyone else noticing "." requests coming in to your DNS servers?
http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=5713
I'm seeing them coming from the following addresses in my ns server
logs.
69.50.142.110
69.50.142.11
76.9.16.171
66.230.128.15
66.230.160.1
-wil
It's hammer time
On Jan 11, 2009, at 10:11 PM, Aaron Imbrock wrote:
Stop
All of my Solaris 10 boxes stayed up with the exception of the Oracle
10g RAC boxes.
db1:~ wschultz$ uname -a
SunOS db1 5.10 Generic_137111-01 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-V490
A friend of mine had his RAC boxes reboot as well, similar
configuration. I've poured through the logs and see normal
At which point my Solaris 10 v490's reboot in unison, lovely.
Anyone else see anything interesting?
-wil
On Dec 31, 2008, at 4:01 PM, Peter Lothberg wrote:
bash-2.05b# date
Thu Jan 1 00:59:58 CET 2009
bash-2.05b# date
Thu Jan 1 00:59:59 CET 2009
bash-2.05b# date
Thu Jan 1 00:59:60 CET 2009
We found a routing loop on 8/20 caused by some maintenance that either
did not get completed, wasn't properly configured, or otherwise had
some problems the evening before. At that point I went ahead and shut
down BGP peering and asked to be notified when all was well.
8/26 notified that al
I see a 503 actually.
When down:
iWil:~ wschultz$ curl www.amazon.com
HTTP/1.1 503 Service Unavailable
Server: NS_6.1
Content-Length:62
Connection: close
iWil:~ wschultz$ wget -S www.amazon.com
--12:21:26-- http://www.amazon.com/
=> `index.html'
Resolving www.amazon.com... 72.21.206.
https seems to work.
-wil
On Jun 6, 2008, at 11:34 AM, Buhrmaster, Gary wrote:
www.amazon.com returns:
Http/1.1 Service Unavailable
Anyone have a URL for a network/etc status page, or info on
the outage? Been that way for a while this morning.
Apparently, Amazon has fallen over, and canno
43 matches
Mail list logo
