com]
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2012 2:20 PM
To: Vitkovsky, Adam; Aled Morris; Eugen Leitl
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: RE: $1.5 billion: The cost of cutting London-Tokyo latency by 60ms
> -Original Message-
> From: Vitkovsky, Adam [mailto:avitkov...@emea.att.com]
> Sent: 23 March 20
That is why there's this neutrinos project
It's not faster than the speed of light though it can shoot through the Earth
and no cables cost involved
So far the speed is 0.1 bit per sec
Can't wait for the neutrino SFPs :)
adam
-Original Message-
From: Aled Morris [mailto:al...@qix.co.uk
only possibility seem to be modificaiton to QM equations
So fingers crossed :)
adam
-Original Message-
From: Aiden Sullivan [mailto:ai...@sullivan.in]
Sent: Friday, December 30, 2011 2:09 PM
To: Vitkovsky, Adam
Cc: Ray Soucy; Tei; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: next-best-transport! down
Well hopefully we won't need to worry about the speed of light anymore
Just recently I heard about the experiments with "quantum nonlocality"
no one seem to understand how it happens but for me it's enough it works
Basically when 2 photons or electrons are emitted form the same source -they
ar
Actually an a Cisco presentation on Nexus 7k I asked whether it's possible to
transport the FCoE over let's say EoMPLS or VPLS and did not get a straight
answer though that was half a year ago
-but it would be really cool to connect hard-drives directly over continents
adam
-Original Mess
(*) If you think I'm going to run an IGP on some of my file servers when
"default route to the world out the public 1G interface, and 5 static routes
describing the private 10G network" is actually the *desired* semantic because
if anybody re-engineers the 10G net enough to make me change the rout
>... host systems should participate in IGP
>We tried that.
>It didn't scale well.
>The Internet today is very different than the Internet in 1981.
-did you? I thought CLNS with plethora of ip addresses compared to ipv4 was
buried before it could be widely deployed, I was not around back than
> and models that doesn't take "we may not get IPv4 space" into account and have
> a contingency plan for that *deserves* to be soundly mocked and ridiculed in
> public.
That's right
However the original post was concerning a fresh new ISP that can't run their
business the way they would like
Ma
Hello Mike,
What exactly do you mean by primary and backup please?
As the tunnel "mpls traffic-eng priority" cmd simply only specifies the setup
and hold priorities
(you'd use those when there are tunnels carrying low priority traffic filling
up the available TE BW -and you need to setup a tunne
't need to worry
about the import/export RTs not matching in two different ASes and configuring
RT rewrites on ASBRs -opt ab will take care of that for you
adam
-Original Message-
From: David Freedman [mailto:david.freed...@uk.clara.net]
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 5:21 PM
To: Vit
Yes please I believe that what Michael have mentioned by the mpls NNI is
actually the RFC 2547bis Option 10A
And yes please as Chris mentioned this Option 10A is used mainly between two
different administrative domains (ISPs) because of the lack of trust and maybe
a sort of configuration simpli
Hello,
Do you know of any "vpn exchange point" implementations please? -I mean
something like IXP but for mpls vpns
Let's say I'm an ISP that bought or merged with many small ISPs each with it's
own AS# and would like to start offering mpls vpn services end to end
If there would be just a few a
12 matches
Mail list logo
