Re: what about 48 bits?

> To be fair, everything for a vax was somewhat pricey. And slow. > > On an even more unrelated note, does anyone remember the day that > CMU-TEK tcp/ip stopped working some time in the early 1990s? That was a > load of fun. What made it stop working? I was the guy to blame for the IP/TCP/UD

Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted

> At 5:08 AM -1000 5/29/07, Randy Bush wrote: > > > (*) Anyone advocating staying with IPv4 and relying > >> on NAT and market demand as an alternative > >> needs to consider the completely deaggregated > >> address usage pattern (and routing table explosion) > >> that results. > >