On 12/28/2014 5:02 PM, Robert Drake wrote:
3. authentication and authorization caching and/or something else
Is this related to the TACACS server being down and the long time out to
hit local authen/author? Sorry, a little late to this party :)
tv
On 12/31/2014 6:08 AM, Marcin Kurek wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm reading Randy's Zhang BGP Design and Implementation and I found
following guidelines about designing RR-based MPLS VPN architecture:
- Partition RRs
- Move RRs out of the forwarding path
- Use a high-end processor with maximum memory
On 11/28/2013 11:37 PM, Jawaid Desktop wrote:
We're a service provider, and we have a network full of Cat6509's. We
are finding that we are outgrowing them from the standpoint of their
ability to handle lots of large routing tables. Obviously their
switching capability is still superb but one o
On 12/29/2011 9:06 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
(you forgot to change subj:)
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 7:59 AM, Cameron Byrne wrote:
Next topic, ethernet is too chaotic and inefficient to deploy and support
mission critical applications in LAN or WAN or data center.
yes, let's get something wi
On 9/12/2011 3:12 PM, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
On Sep 13, 2011, at 2:45 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
In your typical enterprise environment, a 1G DoS will zorch the link long
before it zorches the router at the enterprise side.
This contradicts my experience - I've repeatedly witnessed only a few mb/
On 7/24/2011 7:32 PM, Eric Hileman wrote:
> Thanks! You saw it in use in the context in which I was speaking, correct?
> Isn't PfR the latest iteration of OER?
>
>
Yeah that's the only place I've seen it used. You are probably
right...Pfr moving forward?
tv
_
NANOG mailing list
NANOG@nanog
On 6/2/2011 7:08 PM, andrew.wallace wrote:
World day is a sure-shot bet win at an anti-climax, and an industry
failure and waste of investment and publicity campaign.
Andrew
I've had more customers ask and now willing to participate than ever before.
Any better suggestions? Or, maybe take
- Original Message -
From: "Brandon Kim"
To: ; "nanog group"
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 8:46 AM
Subject: RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you?
For ISL, I know they are trying to phase that out. For the exams, they are
based on dot1q.
Even if I had all cisco equipm
- Original Message -
From: "Chuck Anderson"
To:
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 7:18 AM
Subject: Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you?
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 11:10:16PM -0800, Scott Weeks wrote:
To be fair to Cisco and maybe I'm way off here. But it seems they do
come out wit
- Original Message -
From: "gordon b slater"
To: "Tony Varriale"
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2010 4:38 AM
Subject: Re: BGP support on ASA5585-X
On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 21:50 -0500, Tony Varriale wrote:
said:
>They could make it out of the box but thi
- Original Message -
From:
To: "Greg Whynott"
Cc:
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 6:47 PM
Subject: Re: BGP support on ASA5585-X
They could make it out of the box but this is why Dylan made his statement.
His statement is far fetched at best. Unless of course he's speaking of 100
- Original Message -
From: "Dylan Ebner"
To: "srg" ;
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 12:42 PM
Subject: RE: BGP support on ASA5585-X
IMHO, I don't think this is a marketing issue for cisco. It's a design
issue. PIX/ASA is good at some things, and bad at others. They have >never
been
Of course the high level of oversub is an issue
We'll disagree then. Oversub makes access affordable.
..with the scary boogeyman of evil illegal P2P filesharing
That just tips the money in the wrong direction. And it's a real threat
(amongst others)...not just that deadly clown hiding
- Original Message -
From: "Joe Greco"
To: "Chris Boyd"
Cc: "NANOG"
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 8:59 AM
Subject: Re: Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid,
On one hand, we all recognize oversubscription as an issue.
The high-level of oversub isn't the issue, it's pa
- Original Message -
From: "Joe Greco"
To: "Dobbins, Roland"
Cc: "NANOG list"
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2010 7:03 PM
Subject: Re: Vyatta as a BRAS
On Jul 14, 2010, at 10:17 PM, Joe Greco wrote:
> The truth is that you can keep throwing CPU at a problem as well. I
> can =
size
Original Message -
From: "Bill Stewart"
To: "Tony Varriale"
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 10:22 AM
Subject: Re: Router for Metro Ethernet
That's the spec sheet, and that's for straight forwarding.
If you want to do much of anything else at
Cisco rates it at 256mbps which places it above a NPE-400.
The 3825 says 179mbps on their spec sheet. Not sure where you are getting
your numbers but they are way off.
All of those numbers are straight forwarding with nothing turned on and 64
byte packets. That way you get a nice idea of wh
Why would you migrate them away instead of buying a $150/$250 one-time
license?
tv
- Original Message -
From: "Blomberg, Orin P (DOH)"
To:
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 1:50 PM
Subject: RE: Best VPN Appliance
Thanks for the information. I am just going on what we have been
formally
- Original Message -
From: "Curtis Maurand"
To:
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 8:21 AM
Subject: Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials Update
Can anyone recommend a decent book on IPV6? Most of what I find on the
net don't explain things very well.
thanks,
Curtis
Deploying IPv6 Networks is pr
Residential computers with enough bandwidth to DoS
hosting providers; that should be fun. Maybe it will
encourage the incumbant ISP's to start offering users
meaningful bgp communities since they won't be able
to keep up with the abuse reports.
David
That's already here today.
tv
- Original Message -
From: "Jim Mercer"
To:
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 12:07 AM
Subject: google contact? why is google hosting/supporting/encouraging
spammers?
we have recently started getting alot of spam, out of dubai, from
"ecampaigners@gmail.com"
all of the spa
Would you mind passing along a source/link on the 15kpps? I haven't seen
that number yet.
tv
- Original Message -
From: "Christopher Morrow"
To: "Gadi Evron"
Cc: "NANOG"
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 2:27 PM
Subject: Re: lawful intercept/IOS at BlackHat DC, bypassing and
recom
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Sands"
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 6:01 AM
Subject: Re: DDoS mitigation recommendations
-Original Message-
From: David Freedman [mailto:david.freed...@uk.clara.net]
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 8:17 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subj
- Original Message -
From: "John Jason Brzozowski"
To: "Steven Bellovin"
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 5:12 PM
Subject: Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials
Thanks.
Initially it would be ideal (even preferred) to target trial subscribers
with greater IPv6 awareness. The technical team
That's a vendor specific issue. Maybe you could take it up with them and
ask what year they think this is?
tv
- Original Message -
From: "Florian Weimer"
To: "Seth Mattinen"
Cc: "nanOG list"
Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2010 4:06 AM
Subject: Re: Using /31 for router links
* Seth
Shouldn't be any issues...it's 2010 :)
And, your IP allocation utilization will love you.
tv
- Original Message -
From: "Seth Mattinen"
To: "nanOG list"
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 6:08 PM
Subject: Using /31 for router links
In the past I've always used /30's for PTP connection
LOL! That was purty good and mostly true.
Well, I was thinking from the standpoint of 1) They are going somewhere,
maybe not you 2) breaking law(s) 3) someone has to intervene, eventually.
You could apply the above to any crime really. And they essentially told
you they are going to commit
Would it be possible to string along and coordinate with the appropriate law
enforcement entity?
tv
- Original Message -
From: "Jerry Pasker"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 12:04 PM
Subject: just...wow.
I got this email inquiring about data center space, from the most hones
As a side note that many may be aware of, there are other Cisco
products/code bases that have these nice features.
tv
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Cosgrove"
To: "Richard A Steenbergen"
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 8:04 AM
Subject: Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives
The des
If you read the original post, the poster implied he would benefit from
communities.
If you would like to discuss who,what, when,why and the theoretical, please
start your own thread.
tv
- Original Message -
From: "Karl Auer"
To:
Sent: Sunday, November 01, 2009 4:11 AM
Subject: Re
The answer is fairly simple. Does your business benefit by having the
ability to modify routing strategy as you see fit?
Yes or no?
IMO, the answer is yes. If your business partners aren't on the same page
or align correctly with your requirements, seek new ones.
tv
- Original Message
Core typically references functionality, not the number of network devices
at that layer.
tv
- Original Message -
From: "Richard A Steenbergen"
To: "Bailey Stephen"
Cc:
Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 8:46 AM
Subject: Re: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router.
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 a
I've seen it with "static" public IP pppoe assignment.
No NAT.
Reliability? Best effort at best.
Coverage area is ok.
Speed and reliability is completely dependant on your location. Test first.
Always. And then do not set a decent expectation.
IPSec tunnels dropping? Could be. Again, d
That isn't always true. Some switches are already speced as full. It's
best to read the product docs or speak with a rep to be sure.
tv
- Original Message -
From: "Eric Gearhart"
To: "NANOG list"
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 9:51 AM
Subject: Re: switch speed question
On Tue,
E has a significant presence in Chicago so don't leave us out. :)
tv
- Original Message -
From: "Simon Lockhart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Konstantin Bezruchenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "North American Network Operators Group" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2008 7:47 AM
Any chance this will be captured (maybe professionally via HD:)?
Unfortunately I cannot be there but would really appreciate being in the
audience.
tv
- Original Message -
From: "Rodney Joffe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Scott Francis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "NANOG list"
Sent: Thursday
Yup. You can horde.
You can easily justify a /23 these days and not be multihomed still get a
/22.
tv
- Original Message -
From: "Pete Templin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tony Varriale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 3:32 PM
RIN's general IPv4 allocation policy.
Of course, this could be smoke and mirrors. Not sure.
tv
- Original Message -
From: "Andy Dills" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tony Varriale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 1:53 AM
Subje
AFAIK, ARIN doesn't give out /22s anymore.
Last time I went to the well...it's was a /20 or better.
tv
- Original Message -
From: "Andy Dills" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "William Herrin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 11:05 PM
Subject: Re: [NANOG] Multihoming for small
IIRC, the toolkit(s) can only be installed once having priv 15 on the
device.
If this is the case, the practicality of this is...well...not that
significant.
I do think the significance is that we are getting closer and closer to
treating infrastructure devices as end stations with respect to
40 matches
Mail list logo
