IPv6 standardization - RFC 1883.
I'm wondering when we reach another significant milestone - 50% :-)
Tomas
Original Message
Subject:Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 10:14:18 +0100
From: Tomas Podermanski
To: nanog@nanog
Hey!
New message, please read <http://dinkinsautoservice.com/opinion.php?cm9w>
Tomas Podermanski
False alarm. Sorry for vain hope (if there was any). IPv6 is back in
normal. Seatbelts can be unfasten.
T.
On 6/24/13 2:39 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>> there is massive increase in IPv6 adoption (from 1.5% to 1.7%) in the
>> past few days.
> luckily i had my seatbelt fastened
>
> randy
Hi,
according to Google IPv6 statistics
(http://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html) there is massive
increase in IPv6 adoption (from 1.5% to 1.7%) in the past few days. I
think it is the biggest increase ever. Does anyone have any idea what
happened?
T.
Hi networking guys,
I need some help :-). We try to find for our department reliable
solution for L2 VPN. The task is to connect two remote data centers,
each of them connected two 1Gbps lines (with link aggregation). Only IP
connectivity between data centers is available (so there is no
poss
Hi,
On 11/20/12 7:24 PM, Blair Trosper wrote:
> I've found myself becoming a snob about IPv6. I almost look down on
> IPv4-only networks in the same way that I won't go see a film that isn't
> projected on DLP unless my arm is twisted. I'm a convert, and I'm glad to
> see the adoption rate edgin
Hi,
It seems that today is a "big day" for IPv6. It is the very first
time when native IPv6 on google statistics
(http://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html) reached 1%. Some
might say it is tremendous success after 16 years of deploying IPv6 :-)
T.
o start an open source (free software)
> group dedicated to the development of IPv6 infrastructure systems
> based on Linux. Hopefully this summer I'll be at a point where we
> have some useful technology to provide. You can either talk about the
> challenges of IPv6 deployment,
Hi,
On 12/23/11 7:48 AM, Ray Soucy wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Tomas Podermanski
> wrote:
>
>> Well, then how many devices do you have in the network that uses IPv6?
> Good question, and I applaud you for wanting to verify that people
> talking about
Hi,
On 12/23/11 9:09 PM, Ray Soucy wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Tomas Podermanski
> wrote:
>
>> That is true, but we know solution for IPv4 (DHCP snooping, ARP
>> protection, source address validation) and there are access switches on
>> the market ha
On 12/23/11 6:56 AM, Mohacsi Janos wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, 21 Dec 2011, Tomas Podermanski wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> from my perspective the short answer for this never-ending story is:
>>
>> - SLAAC/RA is totally useless, does not bring any benefit at
Hi,
On 12/23/11 4:33 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Dec 23, 2011, at 3:46 AM, Tomas Podermanski wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 12/22/11 12:18 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>>>> The long answer is:
>>>>
>>>> I completely
Hi,
On 12/23/11 7:07 AM, Mohacsi Janos wrote:
>
> On Thu, 22 Dec 2011, Tomas Podermanski wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 12/21/11 9:40 PM, Ray Soucy wrote:
>>> I'm afraid you're about 10 years too late for this opinion to make
>>> much difference.
Hi,
On 12/22/11 12:18 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>> The long answer is:
>>
>> I completely disagree with opinion that both DHCPv6 and RA (SLAAC)
>> should be supported. It is easy to say that both have place but it has
>> some consequences. I and my colleagues have been working on deploying
>> IPv6 fo
Hi,
On 12/22/11 12:04 AM, Michael Sinatra wrote:
> On 12/21/11 12:40, Ray Soucy wrote:
>> I'm afraid you're about 10 years too late for this opinion to make
>> much difference. ;-)
>>
>> We have been running IPv6 in production for several years (2008) as
>> well (answering this email over IPv6 now
But it does not
look as a good strategy for deploying IPv6 :-(.
Tomas
>
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Tomas Podermanski
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> from my perspective the short answer for this never-ending story is:
>>
>> - SLAAC/RA is totally useless,
earch/view_pub.php?id=9835
[3] Deploying IPv6 in University Campus Network - Practical Problems
http://www.fit.vutbr.cz/research/view_pub.php?id=9836
Regards,
Tomas Podermanski
On 12/20/11 8:31 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> Different operators will have different preferences in different environme
Hi Daniel,
all IPv6 multihoming ideas are very theoretical today. None of them
is ready to use. Shim6 looks very good, but it requires support on both
a client and a server side. As you can guess, there is only experimental
support for some operating systems. Microsoft and Apple doesn't support
18 matches
Mail list logo
