Re: BGP Community - AS0 is de-facto "no-export-to" marker - Any ASN reserved to "export-only-to"?'

2020-09-08 Thread Tom Beecher via NANOG
t defined communities >> have what effect instead of everyone just making up whatever they draw out >> of a hat, simplifying this process for everyone. >> >> >> >> - >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions >> http://www.ics-il.com

Re: BGP Community - AS0 is de-facto "no-export-to" marker - Any ASN reserved to "export-only-to"?'

2020-09-08 Thread Tom Beecher via NANOG
ttp://www.midwest-ix.com > > -- > *From: *"Tom Beecher via NANOG" > *To: *"Douglas Fischer" > *Cc: *"NANOG" > *Sent: *Tuesday, September 8, 2020 1:30:19 PM > *Subject: *Re: BGP Community - AS0 is de-facto "no-expo

Re: BGP Community - AS0 is de-facto "no-export-to" marker - Any ASN reserved to "export-only-to"?'

2020-09-08 Thread Tom Beecher via NANOG
BGP Large Communities ( https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8195 ) already provides for anyone to define the exact handling you wish. On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 11:57 AM Douglas Fischer via NANOG wrote: > Most of us have already used some BGP community policy to no-export some > routes to some where. >

Re: Level 3 issues?

2016-05-17 Thread Tom Beecher via NANOG
Was looking at an internal report not long ago. L3 NYC to Miami looked to be in really rough shape. As I was watching, things flipped inside L3 to go NYC->Boston, then handed off to Cogent.  Didn't dig further than that, but methinks they have something going on, yes.   Thanks, Beecher On