Re: It's been 20 years today (Oct 16, UTC). Hard to believe.

> On Oct 15, 2018, at 10:00 PM, Rodney Joffe wrote: > > At NANOG two weeks ago, we had an interesting discussion at one of the lunch > tables. One of the subjects we discussed was the original IANA, and RFC > Editor, Jon Postel. > > Seven of the ten people at the table had never heard of hi

Re: IPv6 automatic reverse DNS

Hi Wes, > On Oct 29, 2016, at 8:40 AM, Wesley George wrote: > > >> On Oct 28, 2016, at 11:03 PM, White, Andrew >> wrote: >> >> There are two competing drafts for synthetic rule-based PTR responses for >> IPv6 rDNS: >> >> Howard Lee, Time Warner Cable (now Charter) >> https://tools.ietf.org

Re: Dyn DDoS this AM?

> On Oct 24, 2016, at 12:06 PM, Eitan Adler wrote: > > On 24 October 2016 at 01:25, LHC wrote: >> All this TTL talk makes me think. >> >> Why not have two ttls - a 'must-recheck' (does not expire the record but >> forces a recheck; updates record if server replies & serial has incremented) >

Re: IP4 Space - the lie

On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 02:23:59AM +0800, Owen DeLong wrote: > > Owen (who is very glad these are technologies OTHER people will use) > :) My point was not really to push a particular technology, although we believe ds-lite is worth looking at or ISC wouldn't have implemented and released it. (A

Re: IP4 Space - the lie

On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 12:39:19PM +, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote: > er... what part of dual-stack didn't you understand? > dual-stack consumes exactly the same number of v4 and v6 addresses. > > if you expect to dual-stack everything - you need to look again.