Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...

2011-02-09 Thread Stephen Davis
> Practically all broadband providers NAT their customers in the US.  If > you look at the largest ones which are probably Comcast, Verizon, and > AT&T, you have the majority of US broadband subscribers right there. You mean they provide CPE which does NAT? Or the CPE actually has a RFC1918 addres

Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?

2011-01-15 Thread Stephen Davis
> I'm a full supported for getting rid of NAT when deploying IPv6, but > have to say the alternative is not all that great either. > > Because what do people want, they want privacy, so they use the > IPv6 privacy extensions. Which are enabled by default on Windows > when IPv6 is used on XP, Vista

Re: co-location and access to your server

2011-01-12 Thread Stephen Davis
> What is considered normal with regards to access to your co-located > server(s)? Especially when you're just co-locating one or a few servers. Normally you need an escort so you don't go fiddling with other people's hardware. Our provider has a callout fee if we want to get in at nights or weeke