On 10/26/2015 3:00 PM, Job Snijders wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 03:17:37PM -0400, Larry Blunk wrote:
Just wanted to apologize for the attack over the weekend. The
posts came from a email address that was subscribed to the list, so
it was not subjected to moderation. While a filter was a
On 9/11/2015 10:19 PM, Frank Bulk wrote:
Monitoring system reporting this since 11:11 pm U.S. Central
[snippy]
Resolving www.apple.com... 2001:590:1807:187::c77, 2001:590:1807:186::c77
Connecting to www.apple.com|2001:590:1807:187::c77|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response.
On 9/5/2014 5:03 PM, ITechGeek wrote:
Does anyone know if it is possible to get a copy of the Announced and
Withdrawn prefix list a couple weeks ago? Is that weekly list archived
somewhere?
Which weeks? I'm pretty compulsive, and have most of them.
--
"They had discovered Mr. Slippery's True
On 4/25/2014 8:00 AM, Leo Bicknell wrote:
On Apr 23, 2014, at 12:45 AM, Grant Ridder
wrote:
Thought i would throw this out there.
Curious I unleashed grep on a couple of mailing lists I operate.
I turned up one AOL address.
I'm not saying my data is representative of the Internet, but
On 3/27/2014 7:44 PM, Alexander Neilson wrote:
I wonder if they should be invited to only post a single message with
the titles and links to the alerts so that people can follow it up.
Why? Personally, I think it's fine. It only happens (at most) every six
months (and sometimes more like a year
On 1/24/2014 12:31 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Jay Ashworth"
http://www.marketplace.org/topics/tech/down-goes-google-down-goes-internet
It's just been pointed out to me that, even though Marketplace just posted
the link to that piece, the dateline is from Aug
I hate to do this, but it's something that anyone managing email
servers (or just using a smart phone to update LI) needs to know
about. I just saw this on another list I'm on, and I know that there
are folks on NANOG that are on LinkedIn.
++
http://www.bishopfox.com/blog/2013/10/linkedin
On 10/9/2013 6:14 PM, Joe Abley wrote:
I'd also like to thank the members for voting in much greater
numbers than are normally seen, and for having the good sense to
elect three new board members that I'm sure will do a better job than
I would have done!
*I* voted for you. Maybe I should have
you your
"password" (such as it is). Then I noticed that something must have been
resent, since the password showing was not one I would have chosen. Oh,
but wait, there's more.
Upon using the link provided:
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/options/members/shrdlu%40deaddrop.org
I encou
On 7/9/2013 1:38 AM, Saku Ytti wrote:
https://i.chzbgr.com/maxW500/7644490752/h49306FE3/
many complain that they've not seen emails from nanog in few days (since
5th day of 'The Cidr Report')
Next time? Please consider just examining the archives, so that you may
verify that indeed, a miracle
On 3/12/2013 4:16 PM, Warren Bailey wrote:
Contractors with facility clearances? I would find it hard to believe
dot gov would run secure circuits to a non secure facility. ;)
The word "Contractor" is usually used to refer to anyone that has a
contract to do work with the government. Having sp
On 1/16/2013 9:40 AM, john wrote:
I took a look at this site and unfortunately the use of cookies is very
ingrained into the code. Removing the requirement breaks all
functionality of www.ris.ripe.net and changing the functionality would
require a rewrite of the site.
Sooner or later, you'll
On 7/30/2012 12:04 PM, Panashe Flack wrote:
As a quick update, we've implemented some list settings last week to help to
keep spam off the list. New subscribers are moderated until we're comfortable
with their posts...
I dislike this change - how long are subscribers considered "new"?
I app
Normally, I wouldn't top post, but in just this one instance...
Andrew Wallace, aka n3td3v, and one of the few people to EVER be banned
from Full Disclosure, is a troll. Please don't copy his message back
when you reply to him, since most of us long ago dropped him in the kill
file. Everywhere
Owen DeLong wrote:
[snip]
I know this from being a pilot, and, also from having toured the following
ATC facilities:
Towers:
TRACONs:
ARTCCs:
Ditto to absolutely EVERYTHING that Owen said, and I can guarantee this
further, having had experience with various east coast and southeastern
To
Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 05:38:21PM -0800, Shrdlu wrote:
I'm still seeing the DNS servers at udns down, hard. Amazon's cloud will
need a reboot when this is over. Dang, what the heck happened to all
that anycast stuff?
We have some DNS providing type
I'm still seeing the DNS servers at udns down, hard. Amazon's cloud will
need a reboot when this is over. Dang, what the heck happened to all
that anycast stuff?
Mark Pace wrote:
Anyone else having problems resolving DNS from UltraDNS?
I'm seeing this:
$ dig www.ultradns.com @8.8.8.8
Yeah, they went belly up in the last 20 or so. Hard. Looks like it's
hitting some of Amazon's Cloud stuff too. It seems west coast related,
by the way.
--
Oh, mairzy
N. Yaakov Ziskind wrote:
Jack Bates wrote (on Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 09:52:01AM -0500):
John van Oppen wrote:
I think that is a pretty standard procedure. We generally give our
users 12 hours to remove the content before we null-route the IP...
And yet, that may have been exactly what ha
Chris Gotstein wrote:
Anyone else seeing Google's Gmail down right now? Seems to have been
down since 10am CST. We are connected through Chicago.
downforeveryoneorjustme.com is also reporting it's down.
They're having an issue or two. Notably, the inability to display or
access Contacts, and
Mike Lyon wrote:
Howdy,
I am curious what others in the industry think on this topic. When one
registers a domain they can put in their real information or they can use a
proxy, like Go-Daddy's Domains By Proxy.
Now, personally, I would prefer just to get a PO Box and put that address on
my do
Jerry B. Altzman wrote:
Hi,
Yes, I've tried google, I've tried www.nist.gov, I've tried
postmaster/hostmaster/ab...@nist.gov, I've even tried the phone.
Could someone give me a pointer to a mail admin at nist.gov? I've been
having issues getting mail through to them from one of our servers.
Jared Mauch wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 08:07:36AM +0200, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
"They" will keep trying and until a vast majority of ISPs implement
maxas, this will keep happening.
Or until people who are still running multi-year old cisco code
actually upgrade? This seems to
Colin Alston wrote:
I even have a cabinet full of patch/cross-connect gear at one site. The
teleco took some of the NTU kit from it when it was cancelled, said they
would be back for the rest and 2 years later there it stands :)
Murpheys' law says the instant I tie it to the roof of my car, the
Neil wrote:
Do people here really so quickly forget things? There was a talk on
Carnivore given in 2000 at NANOG 20, IIRC, and I believe that one of the
instigating causes of that talk was problems that Earthlink had experienced
when the FBI had deployed Carnivore there.
Naturally. The NSA
Skywing wrote:
I find those speech recognition menus quite annoying. American
Airlines has one that's just not good enough over a lower bitrate
cell voice link in a crowded situation when you're trying to
determine what's the deal with cancelled flights or whatnot along
with everyone else in th
Roy wrote:
Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
...However, I happily used XO+Covad in three separate locations
(in SoCal). DSLExtreme also has (or at least had) a good reputation.
Verizon sucks. In fact, since you are in the Long Beach area, they
suck even more than they do other places. Vote with your
Matthew Black wrote:
On Wed, 24 Dec 2008 09:51:41 -0800
"Tomas L. Byrnes" wrote:
Cox Communications has fully on-shore support. Here in SD they are
actually LOCAL.
In Verizon land, residential customers do not have
CLEC voice or DSL alternatives. We do not have Cox.
Our area is served by
Randy Bush wrote:
On 08.12.24 12:43, Jay Hennigan wrote:
Matthew Black wrote:
I've had difficulties reaching anyone with a brain
at my DSL provider Verizon California.
Switch to a local ISP with local tech support.
bingo.
Uh, ditto? Having left SoCal a couple of years ago, my data is
Eugeniu Patrascu wrote:
Chris wrote:
Now to look at very affordable layer 2, Gigabit 3com switches with
good pps.
You should take a look at HP. They have very good gigabit switches and
also offer lifetime guarantee on them.
HP actually has a CLI to configure the switch, not the crap 3C
Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. wrote:
Joe Abley wrote:
How about moving the meta-nanog themes in this thread to
nanog-futures, instead of adding to the noise on the main list?
Because nobody reads it?
You are mistaken, sir. There are plenty that read it, and meta
discussions belong there.
--
31 matches
Mail list logo
