Isn't this the second time that AS13214 seemed to have made a "unintentional
misconfig"?
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Ricardo Oliveira wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> First, thanks for using Cyclops, and thanks for all the Cyclops users that
> drop me a message about this.
>
> It seems some router in AS
And they will never listen (TELEM).
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Curtis Maurand wrote:
>
> I don't understand why DSL providers don't just administratively down the
> port the customer is hooked to rather than using PPPoE which costs bandwidth
> and has huge management overhead when you have
have been very helpful.
On Apr 18, 2009, at 1:28 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 17/04/2009 15:11, Sharlon R. Carty wrote:
I like would to know what are best practices for an internet
exchange. I
have some concerns about the following;
Can the IXP members use RFC 1918 ip addresses for their peering?
Hello NANOG,
I like would to know what are best practices for an internet exchange. I
have some concerns about the following;
Can the IXP members use RFC 1918 ip addresses for their peering?
Can the IXP members use private autonomous numbers for their peering?
Maybe the answer is obviuos, but I l
The HD-lite streams have no sound.
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Anton Kapela wrote:
> So, I underestimated the popularity of the NANOG 45 meeting.
>
> We've moved the streams to a SJC and NYC reflector pair.
>
> I'm too cheap to implement GSLB or bothering coordinating anycast, so
> you'
te to verizon
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008, Sharlon R. Carty wrote:
> This is my first post.
>
> Can anyone provide some info or Verizon why there is no connectivity to
> Verizon CA(Verizon Business UUNETCA8-A)?
> Can not reach the following net range: 66.48.66.160 - 66.48.66.175
Your best
Hello,
This is my first post.
Can anyone provide some info or Verizon why there is no connectivity to
Verizon CA(Verizon Business UUNETCA8-A)?
Can not reach the following net range: 66.48.66.160 - 66.48.66.175
--sharlon
I definately agree would be cheaper if was available on site.
BTW, they should be back up now.
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Alex Rubenstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wonder if having a spare card there would have been cheaper than this
> outage and resulting flights and labour?
>
> >
> >
Yup, there is a defective card in the Bahamas. They should be flying in
this morning to have it replaced.
It's been out since yesterday evening.
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 9:30 AM, Beavis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I ran through ARCOS(CN) and I didn't get any connectivity disruption
> yesterday.
>
9 matches
Mail list logo
