Re: BGP route processing speed

Hey Sriram, hope, you are doing fine. my BSc thesis from 2010 might be relevant to what you are looking for. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5kLBHCcFJjFZk5RTUtwbUstbm8/view?usp=sharing Best, Sebastian Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed) schrieb: I am interested in measurements related to BGP route

Re: Softlayer / Blocking Cuba IP's ?

Yep, see here https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5kLBHCcFJjFREtoMWtzMXljWXc/view?usp=sharing No prefix responds. Best, Sebastian Am 19.02.2016 um 21:27 schrieb Faisal Imtiaz: > Hello All, > > This is a shout out to Softlayer Network Admin / Policy folks... > > We just went thru a painful proce

Re: Internap route optimization

Hey Mike, do you know route optimizers that actually do optimize inbound traffic? We, at datapath.io, are currently working on this and could not find another one that does it. Best, Sebastian Am 05.11.2015 um 14:21 schrieb Mike Hammett: > Keep in mind that most do not optimize inbound traffic,

yarr - Yet Another Route Server Implementation [WAS: Euro-IX quagga stable download and implementation]

sorry, for the double post. dmarc fuckup... Hey there, considering the state of this discussion, BIRD seems to be the only scalable solution to be used as a route server at IXPs. I have built a large code base around BGP for the hoofprints project [1] and BRITE [2] and would enjoy building anothe

[no subject]

This post was from a subscriber whose From: address domain has a DMARC policy of reject or quarantine. The NANOG mailing list has automatically wrapped this message to prevent other subscribers mail systems from rejecting it.--- Begin Message --- Hey there, considering the state of this discussion

Re: OT: VPS with Routed IP space

Am 26.02.2015 um 22:14 schrieb Owen DeLong: >> On Feb 26, 2015, at 9:58 AM, Sebastian Spies >> wrote: >> >> >> >> Am 24.02.2015 um 23:59 schrieb Doug Barton: >>> On 2/24/15 1:42 PM, Michael Helmeste wrote: >>>> ARP Networks: https://www

Re: OT: VPS with Routed IP space

Am 24.02.2015 um 23:59 schrieb Doug Barton: > On 2/24/15 1:42 PM, Michael Helmeste wrote: >> ARP Networks: https://www.arpnetworks.com/vps >> >> Routed IP space (v4 and v6) as well as BGP peering. > > +1 for Arp, I'm a happy customer (no other affiliation). > > We are going to do this at datapat

Re: ISP inbound failover without BGP

or > another, some old ones as long as 24 hours. * Eyeball ISPs' DNS resolvers might tamper with TTL values. -- SEBASTIAN SPIES lnked.in/sspies vastly.de

Re: Route Server Filters at IXPs and 4-byte ASNs

Am 25.01.2014 16:38, schrieb Bryan Socha: > Re-reading, I was thinking of someone connecting to an IXP, not a new > IXP needing a 2Byte.This is an interesting situation and you are > correct, my comment was off topic. Sorry for not mentioning the beef: Extended Communities effectively leave 6

Route Server Filters at IXPs and 4-byte ASNs

byte ASNs for future IXPs? What other operational problems did you experience while using 4-byte ASNs? A lot of questions. I am very curious about your answers. Cheers, Sebastian -- SEBASTIAN SPIES lnked.in/sspies

Re: incoming smtp from v6 addresses

Am 04.01.2012 11:10, schrieb Randy Bush: > for incoming mail that is *accepted*, i.e. not stuff like > 2012-01-04 00:37:28 REJECT because 118.39.80.118 listed in > rbl-plus.mail-abuse.org > 2012-01-04 00:37:28 H=(nexo.es) [118.39.80.118] F= > rejected RCPT : blocked because 118.39.80.118

Re: economic value of low AS numbers

Hi Dave, On 17.11.2011 15:53, Dave Hart wrote: > I recognize there's no practical shortage of AS numbers. BGP's > preference for low AS numbers doesn't come into play much. On the > other hand, a low AS number can't hurt at the human level when > negotiating peering or attracting customers. Co