On Apr 15, 2010, at 4:26 PM, Jeremy Parr wrote:
> On 15 April 2010 16:18, Dean Anderson wrote:
>> It won't end until the truth finally prevails and they quit trying to
>> mislead people.
>
> Can someone remove this guy form the Nanog list please?
>
He is removed but he still harasses everyone.
network and I am out
and about. It is great and can also do other office type
filtering/monitoring. It has Squid plugins, IMSPector plugins and it
also can do tcpdumps (very useful IMHO)
Ronald Cotoni
Quick suggestion BUT you may want to have Parallels look into it if
you can't seem to find it since you pay for the support anyways. You
may also want to check to see if it is a cron job that is doing it (if
the machine was root kitted, you may have accidentally copied a cron
job over. Another su
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> On Feb 18, 2010, at 3:15 PM, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
>> Dean Anderson wrote:
>>> [Damn. spit out my coffee on keyboard.]
>>>
>>> Levine and Vixie are partners in Whitehat. Whitehat is a commercial bulk
>>> mailer that offers listwashing
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Steven Bellovin wrote:
>
> On Feb 10, 2010, at 4:15 PM, Matt Simmons wrote:
>
>> I'm really interested in their distribution ideas, as well as the
>> bottleneck from the Google network to the rest of the internet.
>>
>> Ah, who am I kidding, it's not like anyone ca
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Drew Weaver wrote:
> Since email reputation is now being based on the neighborhood theory you
> must do one of the following:
>
> Do one of the following (hopefully #1):
>
> 1.) Provide custom reverse DNS for the customer. BCP for SMTP server DNS
> is matching for
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
> telmn...@757.org wrote:
>>>
>>> Did SORBS really cause you that much pain?
>>
>> Yes. We purchased colo space for some systems that didn't need high class
>> of service (mostly development systems.) The IP space in a former lifetime
>> w
at 2:56 PM, Joe Abley wrote:
>
> On 2010-01-13, at 14:51, Ronald Cotoni wrote:
>
>> You should most likely read their terms of service and that would
>> actually answer this instead of guessing.
>
> I've read the terms of service. I may be interpreting them i
You should most likely read their terms of service and that would
actually answer this instead of guessing. Also, if your reading your
own employee's email, that is most likely perfectly legal.
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Joe Abley wrote:
>
> On 2010-01-13, at 11:31, Anthony Uk wrote:
>
>>
Were there any problems on the internet at 1 PM EST yesterday :) But
honestly which provider and in what area?
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Steve Meuse wrote:
> Rich Casto expunged (richca...@gmail.com):
>
>> Is anyone aware of any routing problems with any cable providers yesterday
>> arou
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Tony Finch wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Dec 2009, Chris Edwards wrote:
>> On Wed, 9 Dec 2009, Michael Holstein wrote:
>>
>> | Their initial email said :
>> |
>> | [snip]
>> | Trend Micro Notification: 137.148.0.0/16 added to DUL
>> | [snip]
>>
>> Oh dear. I can see why man
Joe Greco wrote:
there is a fundamental disconnect here. the IP space is neutral.
it has no bias toward or against social behaviours. its a tool.
the actual/real target here are the people who are using these tools
to be antisocial. blacklisting IP space is always reactive and
should only beu
Tom Pipes wrote:
Greetings,
We obtained a direct assigned IP block 69.197.64.0/18 from ARIN in 2008. This block
has been cursed (for lack of a better word) since we obtained it. It seems like
every customer we have added has had repeated issues with being blacklisted by DUL
and the cable c
Dominic J. Eidson wrote:
It appears to be much more a problem with gmail (the MUA) than gmail
(the MDA).
Gmail/imap appears to be working fine, at least from AUS.
- d.
On Tue, 1 Sep 2009, Kameron Gasso wrote:
Jim Wininger wrote:
Anyone else seeing issues with gmail?
Yep, it's been th
http://www.google.com/search?q=list+of+the+most+used+MTAs&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=com.frontmotion:en-US:unofficial&client=firefox-aand
http://www.google.com/search?q=MTA+market+share&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=com.frontmotion:en-US:unofficial&client=firefox-a
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 8:50 AM, Sh
I need to talk to someone at earthlink who is a mail administrator?
And I still have yet to get someone from sorbs to contact me off list. I
wonder if they actually read email (highly doubtful at this point)
To: nanog@nanog.org
> > Subject: Re: Can someone from SORBS contact me offlist?
> >
> > On 7/11/09 11:05 AM, Ronald Cotoni wrote:
> > > Yes, they are really bad. It is actually quite silly that a
> blacklisting
> > > service is that slow on respondi
Yes, they are really bad. It is actually quite silly that a blacklisting
service is that slow on responding to problems.
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 11:45 AM, John Peach wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Jul 2009 11:34:58 -0500
> James Hess wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Christopher
> > Morrow wr
I need to resolve some issues that we are having with you guys but there is
a lack of timelyness with your contact forms, 28 days is simply unacceptable
:(
I have some similar input. At my company, we use both 120 and 208
volt depending on what servers we are putting in the racks. We can
fill up every single rack to full capacity 100% of the time by using
energy efficient servers. The fact that it is 120 volt or 208 volt
hardly matters on most mach
21 matches
Mail list logo
